Hi TIll, I went ahead and added the users list info to the Readme, please +2 if it looks OK: https://asterix-gerrit.ics.uci.edu/#/c/258/
Thanks, - Ian On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 10:07 PM, Till Westmann <[email protected]> wrote: > I’ve also added this list to our incubation status page [1]. > > @Ian, could you add the new list to the readme when you update it again? > > Cheers, > Till > > [1] http://incubator.apache.org/projects/asterixdb.html < > http://incubator.apache.org/projects/asterixdb.html> > > > On May 11, 2015, at 9:45 PM, Till Westmann <[email protected] <mailto: > [email protected]>> wrote: > > > > [email protected] <mailto: > [email protected]> is available now. > > Please subscribe to it, so that we can close the old list down. > > > > Cheers, > > Till > > > >> On May 9, 2015, at 9:14 AM, Till Westmann <[email protected] <mailto: > [email protected]>> wrote: > >> > >> I’ve requested a users mailing list using the request form at [1]. > >> The listed moderators are our mentors and 2 volunteers (Mike and I). > >> > >> Cheers, > >> Till > >> > >> [1] https://infra.apache.org/officers/mlreq/incubator < > https://infra.apache.org/officers/mlreq/incubator> > >> > >>> On May 3, 2015, at 11:41 PM, Mike Carey <[email protected] <mailto: > [email protected]>> wrote: > >>> > >>> Cool! > >>> > >>> On 5/3/15 5:08 PM, Ted Dunning wrote: > >>>> the way that moderation works at Apache is that moderators see > candidate > >>>> messages in email with links to accept or reject. Reply with no > >>>> modifications works to accept the message. Reply-all accepts the > message > >>>> and whitelists the sender. > >>>> > >>>> If no moderator takes action for several days, the message is deleted. > >>>> > >>>> Super simple and fast. The only obscure part is the the reply-all > trick. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> On Sun, May 3, 2015 at 10:44 PM, Mike Carey <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> I could do it as well. (Does it just entail saying "this note may > indeed > >>>>> pass" to a queue of msgs - a queue we'd all be trying to watch?) > >>>>> > >>>>> Cheers, > >>>>> Mike > >>>>> > >>>>> On 5/3/15 1:11 PM, Till Westmann wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> I agree with your feeling. If we decide to do it that way, I’m > >>>>>> volunteering to be another moderator. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Are there other volunteers? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On May 3, 2015, at 10:29 AM, Ted Dunning <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > >>>>>>> My feeling is it doesn't hurt to have more moderators rather than > fewer. > >>>>>>> Judicious white-listing allows the amount of moderation traffic to > be > >>>>>>> driven to very low levels so the load on the moderators is very, > very > >>>>>>> low. > >>>>>>> The cost of losing a moderator without quite knowing it it higher, > I > >>>>>>> think, > >>>>>>> than the load on a number of moderators. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> On Sun, May 3, 2015 at 6:17 PM, Till Westmann <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Well, the JIRA was not the right way to request this. > >>>>>>>> But before we do it the right way, we need a few moderators for > the > >>>>>>>> list. > >>>>>>>> I assume that the mentors are the moderators for the other lists. > >>>>>>>> Is that the way it should be or should other PPMC members > moderate as > >>>>>>>> well? > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Thanks, > >>>>>>>> Till > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> On May 2, 2015, at 18:30, Till Westmann <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>> Here’s the JIRA: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-9580 < > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-9580> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Cheers, > >>>>>>>>> Till > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> On May 2, 2015, at 5:39 PM, Till Westmann <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> Ok, since nobody objected, I’ll ask for the users list. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Cheers, > >>>>>>>>>> Till > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> On Apr 25, 2015, at 12:16 AM, Till Westmann <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> > >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Since this is just a procedural decision that has no impact > outside > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> the AsterixDB podling, I think that the PPMC members (mentors + > >>>>>>>> initial > >>>>>>>> committer) are those who get to decide. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> And as this is probably not a highly contested issue, we could > take > >>>>>>>>>> this decision by lazy consensus [1], i.e. your proposal is > accepted, > >>>>>>>> if > >>>>>>>> nobody objects within 72 hours. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Cheers, > >>>>>>>>>>> Till > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html < > https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> On Apr 24, 2015, at 08:09, Mike Carey <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>> Given the discussions, I'd like to propose now that we close > in on a > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> "two lists - dev and user" - answer to this one. I realize > there are > >>>>>>>> tradeoffs, but because we do have some users already who are > decidedly > >>>>>>>> non-developer types - and more coming - I'd like to have a list > "for > >>>>>>>> them" > >>>>>>>> that encourages them to be on it (by its topics and volume). Is > there a > >>>>>>>> way we can/should bring this to a vote/decision by those that get > to > >>>>>>>> decide? (This will be our first case-study in a > post-joining-incubation > >>>>>>>> decision. :-)) > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Cheers, > >>>>>>>>>>>> Mike > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> On 4/24/15 5:46 AM, Jochen Wiedmann wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 9:49 AM, Till Westmann < > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>> I’m not completely sure that I want one. We currently have one > and > >>>>>>>>>>>>> it has some reasonable traffic and the discussions are at a > >>>>>>>> user-level. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Also all developers are subscribed to the user-list, so > developers > >>>>>>>>>>>>> are aware of user problems but not necessarily the other way > >>>>>>>> around. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> I think that works pretty well, but maybe a single list would > work > >>>>>>>>>>>>> better. > >>>>>>>>> Thoughts from the other AsterixDB developers? > >>>>>>>>>>>>> What about automatically generated notifications, like Jira > issues, > >>>>>>>>>>>>> commit messages, etc.? > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> I wouldn't recommend to push those to a user list? > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Jochen > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>> > >> > > > >
