Thanks! Do you want to use use the UCI or the Apache e-mail address?
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 10:44 AM, Ian Maxon <[email protected]> wrote: > If I'm not already a moderator I'd be happy to volunteer... > > - Ian > > On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 11:09 PM, Till Westmann <[email protected]> wrote: > > > We currently have 7 moderators, so I think that we can just take you out > > (I guess that requires and infra-request, is that right?). > > > > On the other hand I would be more than happy if we found another > volunteer > > moderator! > > > > Cheers, > > Till > > > > > On May 11, 2015, at 11:05 PM, Jochen Wiedmann < > [email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > > I'd welcome to have another volunteer to replace me as a moderator. > > > (As this would be my 9th or 10th list to moderate.) As Till wrote, > > > list moderation isn't much of a burden. OTOH, it accumulates... > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > Jochen > > > > > > > > > On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 7:57 AM, Till Westmann <[email protected]> > wrote: > > >> Just found a link to the self-subscribe app [1] for committers on the > > mailing lists page [2]. > > >> The mailing lists for podlings are at the end of the (long!) dropdown. > > >> > > >> Cheers, > > >> Till > > >> > > >> [1] https://whimsy.apache.org/committers/subscribe < > > https://whimsy.apache.org/committers/subscribe> > > >> [2] http://apache.org/foundation/mailinglists.html < > > http://apache.org/foundation/mailinglists.html> > > >> > > >>> On May 11, 2015, at 10:07 PM, Till Westmann <[email protected]> > wrote: > > >>> > > >>> I’ve also added this list to our incubation status page [1]. > > >>> > > >>> @Ian, could you add the new list to the readme when you update it > > again? > > >>> > > >>> Cheers, > > >>> Till > > >>> > > >>> [1] http://incubator.apache.org/projects/asterixdb.html < > > http://incubator.apache.org/projects/asterixdb.html> > > >>> > > >>>> On May 11, 2015, at 9:45 PM, Till Westmann <[email protected] > <mailto: > > [email protected]>> wrote: > > >>>> > > >>>> [email protected] <mailto: > > [email protected]> is available now. > > >>>> Please subscribe to it, so that we can close the old list down. > > >>>> > > >>>> Cheers, > > >>>> Till > > >>>> > > >>>>> On May 9, 2015, at 9:14 AM, Till Westmann <[email protected] > <mailto: > > [email protected]>> wrote: > > >>>>> > > >>>>> I’ve requested a users mailing list using the request form at [1]. > > >>>>> The listed moderators are our mentors and 2 volunteers (Mike and > I). > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Cheers, > > >>>>> Till > > >>>>> > > >>>>> [1] https://infra.apache.org/officers/mlreq/incubator < > > https://infra.apache.org/officers/mlreq/incubator> > > >>>>> > > >>>>>> On May 3, 2015, at 11:41 PM, Mike Carey <[email protected] > <mailto: > > [email protected]>> wrote: > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> Cool! > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> On 5/3/15 5:08 PM, Ted Dunning wrote: > > >>>>>>> the way that moderation works at Apache is that moderators see > > candidate > > >>>>>>> messages in email with links to accept or reject. Reply with no > > >>>>>>> modifications works to accept the message. Reply-all accepts the > > message > > >>>>>>> and whitelists the sender. > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> If no moderator takes action for several days, the message is > > deleted. > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> Super simple and fast. The only obscure part is the the > reply-all > > trick. > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> On Sun, May 3, 2015 at 10:44 PM, Mike Carey <[email protected] > > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> I could do it as well. (Does it just entail saying "this note > > may indeed > > >>>>>>>> pass" to a queue of msgs - a queue we'd all be trying to watch?) > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> Cheers, > > >>>>>>>> Mike > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> On 5/3/15 1:11 PM, Till Westmann wrote: > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> I agree with your feeling. If we decide to do it that way, I’m > > >>>>>>>>> volunteering to be another moderator. > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> Are there other volunteers? > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> On May 3, 2015, at 10:29 AM, Ted Dunning < > [email protected] > > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>> My feeling is it doesn't hurt to have more moderators rather > > than fewer. > > >>>>>>>>>> Judicious white-listing allows the amount of moderation > traffic > > to be > > >>>>>>>>>> driven to very low levels so the load on the moderators is > > very, very > > >>>>>>>>>> low. > > >>>>>>>>>> The cost of losing a moderator without quite knowing it it > > higher, I > > >>>>>>>>>> think, > > >>>>>>>>>> than the load on a number of moderators. > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> On Sun, May 3, 2015 at 6:17 PM, Till Westmann < > [email protected] > > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> Well, the JIRA was not the right way to request this. > > >>>>>>>>>>> But before we do it the right way, we need a few moderators > > for the > > >>>>>>>>>>> list. > > >>>>>>>>>>> I assume that the mentors are the moderators for the other > > lists. > > >>>>>>>>>>> Is that the way it should be or should other PPMC members > > moderate as > > >>>>>>>>>>> well? > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, > > >>>>>>>>>>> Till > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> On May 2, 2015, at 18:30, Till Westmann <[email protected] > > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Here’s the JIRA: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-9580 < > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-9580> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers, > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Till > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> On May 2, 2015, at 5:39 PM, Till Westmann <[email protected] > > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Ok, since nobody objected, I’ll ask for the users list. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Till > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Apr 25, 2015, at 12:16 AM, Till Westmann < > > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Since this is just a procedural decision that has no > impact > > outside > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> the AsterixDB podling, I think that the PPMC members > > (mentors + > > >>>>>>>>>>> initial > > >>>>>>>>>>> committer) are those who get to decide. > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> And as this is probably not a highly contested issue, we > > could take > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> this decision by lazy consensus [1], i.e. your proposal is > > accepted, > > >>>>>>>>>>> if > > >>>>>>>>>>> nobody objects within 72 hours. > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Till > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html < > > https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Apr 24, 2015, at 08:09, Mike Carey <[email protected] > > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Given the discussions, I'd like to propose now that we > > close in on a > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> "two lists - dev and user" - answer to this one. I realize > > there are > > >>>>>>>>>>> tradeoffs, but because we do have some users already who are > > decidedly > > >>>>>>>>>>> non-developer types - and more coming - I'd like to have a > > list "for > > >>>>>>>>>>> them" > > >>>>>>>>>>> that encourages them to be on it (by its topics and volume). > > Is there a > > >>>>>>>>>>> way we can/should bring this to a vote/decision by those that > > get to > > >>>>>>>>>>> decide? (This will be our first case-study in a > > post-joining-incubation > > >>>>>>>>>>> decision. :-)) > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mike > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 4/24/15 5:46 AM, Jochen Wiedmann wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 9:49 AM, Till Westmann < > > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>> I’m not completely sure that I want one. We currently have > > one and > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it has some reasonable traffic and the discussions are > at > > a > > >>>>>>>>>>> user-level. > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Also all developers are subscribed to the user-list, so > > developers > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are aware of user problems but not necessarily the other > > way > > >>>>>>>>>>> around. > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> I think that works pretty well, but maybe a single list > would > > work > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> better. > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Thoughts from the other AsterixDB developers? > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What about automatically generated notifications, like > > Jira issues, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> commit messages, etc.? > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I wouldn't recommend to push those to a user list? > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jochen > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>> > > >>> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Any world that can produce the Taj Mahal, William Shakespeare, > > > and Stripe toothpaste can't be all bad. (C.R. MacNamara, One Two Three) > > > > >
