If I'm not already a moderator I'd be happy to volunteer... - Ian
On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 11:09 PM, Till Westmann <[email protected]> wrote: > We currently have 7 moderators, so I think that we can just take you out > (I guess that requires and infra-request, is that right?). > > On the other hand I would be more than happy if we found another volunteer > moderator! > > Cheers, > Till > > > On May 11, 2015, at 11:05 PM, Jochen Wiedmann <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > I'd welcome to have another volunteer to replace me as a moderator. > > (As this would be my 9th or 10th list to moderate.) As Till wrote, > > list moderation isn't much of a burden. OTOH, it accumulates... > > > > Thanks, > > > > Jochen > > > > > > On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 7:57 AM, Till Westmann <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Just found a link to the self-subscribe app [1] for committers on the > mailing lists page [2]. > >> The mailing lists for podlings are at the end of the (long!) dropdown. > >> > >> Cheers, > >> Till > >> > >> [1] https://whimsy.apache.org/committers/subscribe < > https://whimsy.apache.org/committers/subscribe> > >> [2] http://apache.org/foundation/mailinglists.html < > http://apache.org/foundation/mailinglists.html> > >> > >>> On May 11, 2015, at 10:07 PM, Till Westmann <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> > >>> I’ve also added this list to our incubation status page [1]. > >>> > >>> @Ian, could you add the new list to the readme when you update it > again? > >>> > >>> Cheers, > >>> Till > >>> > >>> [1] http://incubator.apache.org/projects/asterixdb.html < > http://incubator.apache.org/projects/asterixdb.html> > >>> > >>>> On May 11, 2015, at 9:45 PM, Till Westmann <[email protected] <mailto: > [email protected]>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> [email protected] <mailto: > [email protected]> is available now. > >>>> Please subscribe to it, so that we can close the old list down. > >>>> > >>>> Cheers, > >>>> Till > >>>> > >>>>> On May 9, 2015, at 9:14 AM, Till Westmann <[email protected] <mailto: > [email protected]>> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> I’ve requested a users mailing list using the request form at [1]. > >>>>> The listed moderators are our mentors and 2 volunteers (Mike and I). > >>>>> > >>>>> Cheers, > >>>>> Till > >>>>> > >>>>> [1] https://infra.apache.org/officers/mlreq/incubator < > https://infra.apache.org/officers/mlreq/incubator> > >>>>> > >>>>>> On May 3, 2015, at 11:41 PM, Mike Carey <[email protected] <mailto: > [email protected]>> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Cool! > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On 5/3/15 5:08 PM, Ted Dunning wrote: > >>>>>>> the way that moderation works at Apache is that moderators see > candidate > >>>>>>> messages in email with links to accept or reject. Reply with no > >>>>>>> modifications works to accept the message. Reply-all accepts the > message > >>>>>>> and whitelists the sender. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> If no moderator takes action for several days, the message is > deleted. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Super simple and fast. The only obscure part is the the reply-all > trick. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> On Sun, May 3, 2015 at 10:44 PM, Mike Carey <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> I could do it as well. (Does it just entail saying "this note > may indeed > >>>>>>>> pass" to a queue of msgs - a queue we'd all be trying to watch?) > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Cheers, > >>>>>>>> Mike > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> On 5/3/15 1:11 PM, Till Westmann wrote: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> I agree with your feeling. If we decide to do it that way, I’m > >>>>>>>>> volunteering to be another moderator. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Are there other volunteers? > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> On May 3, 2015, at 10:29 AM, Ted Dunning <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> My feeling is it doesn't hurt to have more moderators rather > than fewer. > >>>>>>>>>> Judicious white-listing allows the amount of moderation traffic > to be > >>>>>>>>>> driven to very low levels so the load on the moderators is > very, very > >>>>>>>>>> low. > >>>>>>>>>> The cost of losing a moderator without quite knowing it it > higher, I > >>>>>>>>>> think, > >>>>>>>>>> than the load on a number of moderators. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> On Sun, May 3, 2015 at 6:17 PM, Till Westmann <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Well, the JIRA was not the right way to request this. > >>>>>>>>>>> But before we do it the right way, we need a few moderators > for the > >>>>>>>>>>> list. > >>>>>>>>>>> I assume that the mentors are the moderators for the other > lists. > >>>>>>>>>>> Is that the way it should be or should other PPMC members > moderate as > >>>>>>>>>>> well? > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, > >>>>>>>>>>> Till > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> On May 2, 2015, at 18:30, Till Westmann <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>> Here’s the JIRA: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-9580 < > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-9580> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers, > >>>>>>>>>>>> Till > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> On May 2, 2015, at 5:39 PM, Till Westmann <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Ok, since nobody objected, I’ll ask for the users list. > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers, > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Till > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Apr 25, 2015, at 12:16 AM, Till Westmann < > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Since this is just a procedural decision that has no impact > outside > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> the AsterixDB podling, I think that the PPMC members > (mentors + > >>>>>>>>>>> initial > >>>>>>>>>>> committer) are those who get to decide. > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> And as this is probably not a highly contested issue, we > could take > >>>>>>>>>>>>> this decision by lazy consensus [1], i.e. your proposal is > accepted, > >>>>>>>>>>> if > >>>>>>>>>>> nobody objects within 72 hours. > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Till > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html < > https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Apr 24, 2015, at 08:09, Mike Carey <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Given the discussions, I'd like to propose now that we > close in on a > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> "two lists - dev and user" - answer to this one. I realize > there are > >>>>>>>>>>> tradeoffs, but because we do have some users already who are > decidedly > >>>>>>>>>>> non-developer types - and more coming - I'd like to have a > list "for > >>>>>>>>>>> them" > >>>>>>>>>>> that encourages them to be on it (by its topics and volume). > Is there a > >>>>>>>>>>> way we can/should bring this to a vote/decision by those that > get to > >>>>>>>>>>> decide? (This will be our first case-study in a > post-joining-incubation > >>>>>>>>>>> decision. :-)) > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mike > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 4/24/15 5:46 AM, Jochen Wiedmann wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 9:49 AM, Till Westmann < > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>> I’m not completely sure that I want one. We currently have > one and > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it has some reasonable traffic and the discussions are at > a > >>>>>>>>>>> user-level. > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Also all developers are subscribed to the user-list, so > developers > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are aware of user problems but not necessarily the other > way > >>>>>>>>>>> around. > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> I think that works pretty well, but maybe a single list would > work > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> better. > >>>>>>>>>>>> Thoughts from the other AsterixDB developers? > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What about automatically generated notifications, like > Jira issues, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> commit messages, etc.? > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I wouldn't recommend to push those to a user list? > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jochen > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>> > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > Any world that can produce the Taj Mahal, William Shakespeare, > > and Stripe toothpaste can't be all bad. (C.R. MacNamara, One Two Three) > >
