Oh, on the commit logs? Unfortunately in Gerrit it takes the committer from the account's email address, I believe...
- Ian On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 5:17 PM, Till Westmann <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks! > > Do you want to use use the UCI or the Apache e-mail address? > > > On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 10:44 AM, Ian Maxon <[email protected]> wrote: > > > If I'm not already a moderator I'd be happy to volunteer... > > > > - Ian > > > > On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 11:09 PM, Till Westmann <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > We currently have 7 moderators, so I think that we can just take you > out > > > (I guess that requires and infra-request, is that right?). > > > > > > On the other hand I would be more than happy if we found another > > volunteer > > > moderator! > > > > > > Cheers, > > > Till > > > > > > > On May 11, 2015, at 11:05 PM, Jochen Wiedmann < > > [email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > I'd welcome to have another volunteer to replace me as a moderator. > > > > (As this would be my 9th or 10th list to moderate.) As Till wrote, > > > > list moderation isn't much of a burden. OTOH, it accumulates... > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > Jochen > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 7:57 AM, Till Westmann <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > >> Just found a link to the self-subscribe app [1] for committers on > the > > > mailing lists page [2]. > > > >> The mailing lists for podlings are at the end of the (long!) > dropdown. > > > >> > > > >> Cheers, > > > >> Till > > > >> > > > >> [1] https://whimsy.apache.org/committers/subscribe < > > > https://whimsy.apache.org/committers/subscribe> > > > >> [2] http://apache.org/foundation/mailinglists.html < > > > http://apache.org/foundation/mailinglists.html> > > > >> > > > >>> On May 11, 2015, at 10:07 PM, Till Westmann <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > >>> > > > >>> I’ve also added this list to our incubation status page [1]. > > > >>> > > > >>> @Ian, could you add the new list to the readme when you update it > > > again? > > > >>> > > > >>> Cheers, > > > >>> Till > > > >>> > > > >>> [1] http://incubator.apache.org/projects/asterixdb.html < > > > http://incubator.apache.org/projects/asterixdb.html> > > > >>> > > > >>>> On May 11, 2015, at 9:45 PM, Till Westmann <[email protected] > > <mailto: > > > [email protected]>> wrote: > > > >>>> > > > >>>> [email protected] <mailto: > > > [email protected]> is available now. > > > >>>> Please subscribe to it, so that we can close the old list down. > > > >>>> > > > >>>> Cheers, > > > >>>> Till > > > >>>> > > > >>>>> On May 9, 2015, at 9:14 AM, Till Westmann <[email protected] > > <mailto: > > > [email protected]>> wrote: > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> I’ve requested a users mailing list using the request form at > [1]. > > > >>>>> The listed moderators are our mentors and 2 volunteers (Mike and > > I). > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> Cheers, > > > >>>>> Till > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> [1] https://infra.apache.org/officers/mlreq/incubator < > > > https://infra.apache.org/officers/mlreq/incubator> > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>>> On May 3, 2015, at 11:41 PM, Mike Carey <[email protected] > > <mailto: > > > [email protected]>> wrote: > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> Cool! > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> On 5/3/15 5:08 PM, Ted Dunning wrote: > > > >>>>>>> the way that moderation works at Apache is that moderators see > > > candidate > > > >>>>>>> messages in email with links to accept or reject. Reply with > no > > > >>>>>>> modifications works to accept the message. Reply-all accepts > the > > > message > > > >>>>>>> and whitelists the sender. > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> If no moderator takes action for several days, the message is > > > deleted. > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> Super simple and fast. The only obscure part is the the > > reply-all > > > trick. > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> On Sun, May 3, 2015 at 10:44 PM, Mike Carey <[email protected] > > > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> I could do it as well. (Does it just entail saying "this note > > > may indeed > > > >>>>>>>> pass" to a queue of msgs - a queue we'd all be trying to > watch?) > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> Cheers, > > > >>>>>>>> Mike > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> On 5/3/15 1:11 PM, Till Westmann wrote: > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> I agree with your feeling. If we decide to do it that way, > I’m > > > >>>>>>>>> volunteering to be another moderator. > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> Are there other volunteers? > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> On May 3, 2015, at 10:29 AM, Ted Dunning < > > [email protected] > > > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > > >>>>>>>>>> My feeling is it doesn't hurt to have more moderators rather > > > than fewer. > > > >>>>>>>>>> Judicious white-listing allows the amount of moderation > > traffic > > > to be > > > >>>>>>>>>> driven to very low levels so the load on the moderators is > > > very, very > > > >>>>>>>>>> low. > > > >>>>>>>>>> The cost of losing a moderator without quite knowing it it > > > higher, I > > > >>>>>>>>>> think, > > > >>>>>>>>>> than the load on a number of moderators. > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> On Sun, May 3, 2015 at 6:17 PM, Till Westmann < > > [email protected] > > > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> Well, the JIRA was not the right way to request this. > > > >>>>>>>>>>> But before we do it the right way, we need a few moderators > > > for the > > > >>>>>>>>>>> list. > > > >>>>>>>>>>> I assume that the mentors are the moderators for the other > > > lists. > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Is that the way it should be or should other PPMC members > > > moderate as > > > >>>>>>>>>>> well? > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Till > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> On May 2, 2015, at 18:30, Till Westmann <[email protected] > > > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Here’s the JIRA: > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-9580 < > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-9580> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers, > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Till > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> On May 2, 2015, at 5:39 PM, Till Westmann < > [email protected] > > > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Ok, since nobody objected, I’ll ask for the users list. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers, > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Till > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Apr 25, 2015, at 12:16 AM, Till Westmann < > > > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Since this is just a procedural decision that has no > > impact > > > outside > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> the AsterixDB podling, I think that the PPMC members > > > (mentors + > > > >>>>>>>>>>> initial > > > >>>>>>>>>>> committer) are those who get to decide. > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> And as this is probably not a highly contested issue, we > > > could take > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> this decision by lazy consensus [1], i.e. your proposal > is > > > accepted, > > > >>>>>>>>>>> if > > > >>>>>>>>>>> nobody objects within 72 hours. > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers, > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Till > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html < > > > https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Apr 24, 2015, at 08:09, Mike Carey < > [email protected] > > > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Given the discussions, I'd like to propose now that we > > > close in on a > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> "two lists - dev and user" - answer to this one. I > realize > > > there are > > > >>>>>>>>>>> tradeoffs, but because we do have some users already who > are > > > decidedly > > > >>>>>>>>>>> non-developer types - and more coming - I'd like to have a > > > list "for > > > >>>>>>>>>>> them" > > > >>>>>>>>>>> that encourages them to be on it (by its topics and > volume). > > > Is there a > > > >>>>>>>>>>> way we can/should bring this to a vote/decision by those > that > > > get to > > > >>>>>>>>>>> decide? (This will be our first case-study in a > > > post-joining-incubation > > > >>>>>>>>>>> decision. :-)) > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers, > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mike > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 4/24/15 5:46 AM, Jochen Wiedmann wrote: > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 9:49 AM, Till Westmann < > > > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> I’m not completely sure that I want one. We currently have > > > one and > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it has some reasonable traffic and the discussions are > > at > > > a > > > >>>>>>>>>>> user-level. > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Also all developers are subscribed to the user-list, so > > > developers > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are aware of user problems but not necessarily the > other > > > way > > > >>>>>>>>>>> around. > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> I think that works pretty well, but maybe a single list > > would > > > work > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> better. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Thoughts from the other AsterixDB developers? > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What about automatically generated notifications, like > > > Jira issues, > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> commit messages, etc.? > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I wouldn't recommend to push those to a user list? > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jochen > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Any world that can produce the Taj Mahal, William Shakespeare, > > > > and Stripe toothpaste can't be all bad. (C.R. MacNamara, One Two > Three) > > > > > > > > >
