Bite your tongue! We can't ever lose Ian.... :-)
On 5/12/15 9:49 PM, Ted Dunning wrote:
Actually, the Apache one is probably better since work addresses can
disappear.
On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 2:08 AM, Ian Maxon <[email protected]> wrote:
Ah I see, sorry! The UCI one is probably best, then.
- Ian
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 5:50 PM, Till Westmann <[email protected]> wrote:
No for the moderation e-mails :)
Which address do you use for the mailing lists?
Thanks,
Till
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 5:29 PM, Ian Maxon <[email protected]> wrote:
Oh, on the commit logs? Unfortunately in Gerrit it takes the committer
from
the account's email address, I believe...
- Ian
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 5:17 PM, Till Westmann <[email protected]>
wrote:
Thanks!
Do you want to use use the UCI or the Apache e-mail address?
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 10:44 AM, Ian Maxon <[email protected]> wrote:
If I'm not already a moderator I'd be happy to volunteer...
- Ian
On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 11:09 PM, Till Westmann <[email protected]>
wrote:
We currently have 7 moderators, so I think that we can just take
you
out
(I guess that requires and infra-request, is that right?).
On the other hand I would be more than happy if we found another
volunteer
moderator!
Cheers,
Till
On May 11, 2015, at 11:05 PM, Jochen Wiedmann <
[email protected]>
wrote:
I'd welcome to have another volunteer to replace me as a
moderator.
(As this would be my 9th or 10th list to moderate.) As Till
wrote,
list moderation isn't much of a burden. OTOH, it accumulates...
Thanks,
Jochen
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 7:57 AM, Till Westmann <
[email protected]
wrote:
Just found a link to the self-subscribe app [1] for committers
on
the
mailing lists page [2].
The mailing lists for podlings are at the end of the (long!)
dropdown.
Cheers,
Till
[1] https://whimsy.apache.org/committers/subscribe <
https://whimsy.apache.org/committers/subscribe>
[2] http://apache.org/foundation/mailinglists.html <
http://apache.org/foundation/mailinglists.html>
On May 11, 2015, at 10:07 PM, Till Westmann <
[email protected]>
wrote:
I’ve also added this list to our incubation status page [1].
@Ian, could you add the new list to the readme when you
update
it
again?
Cheers,
Till
[1] http://incubator.apache.org/projects/asterixdb.html <
http://incubator.apache.org/projects/asterixdb.html>
On May 11, 2015, at 9:45 PM, Till Westmann <
[email protected]
<mailto:
[email protected]>> wrote:
[email protected] <mailto:
[email protected]> is available now.
Please subscribe to it, so that we can close the old list
down.
Cheers,
Till
On May 9, 2015, at 9:14 AM, Till Westmann <
[email protected]
<mailto:
[email protected]>> wrote:
I’ve requested a users mailing list using the request form
at
[1].
The listed moderators are our mentors and 2 volunteers
(Mike
and
I).
Cheers,
Till
[1] https://infra.apache.org/officers/mlreq/incubator <
https://infra.apache.org/officers/mlreq/incubator>
On May 3, 2015, at 11:41 PM, Mike Carey <
[email protected]
<mailto:
[email protected]>> wrote:
Cool!
On 5/3/15 5:08 PM, Ted Dunning wrote:
the way that moderation works at Apache is that
moderators
see
candidate
messages in email with links to accept or reject. Reply
with
no
modifications works to accept the message. Reply-all
accepts
the
message
and whitelists the sender.
If no moderator takes action for several days, the
message
is
deleted.
Super simple and fast. The only obscure part is the the
reply-all
trick.
On Sun, May 3, 2015 at 10:44 PM, Mike Carey <
[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
I could do it as well. (Does it just entail saying
"this
note
may indeed
pass" to a queue of msgs - a queue we'd all be trying to
watch?)
Cheers,
Mike
On 5/3/15 1:11 PM, Till Westmann wrote:
I agree with your feeling. If we decide to do it that
way,
I’m
volunteering to be another moderator.
Are there other volunteers?
On May 3, 2015, at 10:29 AM, Ted Dunning <
[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
My feeling is it doesn't hurt to have more moderators
rather
than fewer.
Judicious white-listing allows the amount of
moderation
traffic
to be
driven to very low levels so the load on the
moderators
is
very, very
low.
The cost of losing a moderator without quite knowing
it
it
higher, I
think,
than the load on a number of moderators.
On Sun, May 3, 2015 at 6:17 PM, Till Westmann <
[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Well, the JIRA was not the right way to request this.
But before we do it the right way, we need a few
moderators
for the
list.
I assume that the mentors are the moderators for the
other
lists.
Is that the way it should be or should other PPMC
members
moderate as
well?
Thanks,
Till
On May 2, 2015, at 18:30, Till Westmann <
[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Here’s the JIRA:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-9580 <
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-9580>
Cheers,
Till
On May 2, 2015, at 5:39 PM, Till Westmann <
[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Ok, since nobody objected, I’ll ask for the users
list.
Cheers,
Till
On Apr 25, 2015, at 12:16 AM, Till Westmann <
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
wrote:
Since this is just a procedural decision that has
no
impact
outside
the AsterixDB podling, I think that the PPMC
members
(mentors +
initial
committer) are those who get to decide.
And as this is probably not a highly contested
issue,
we
could take
this decision by lazy consensus [1], i.e. your
proposal
is
accepted,
if
nobody objects within 72 hours.
Cheers,
Till
[1] https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html
<
https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html>
On Apr 24, 2015, at 08:09, Mike Carey <
[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Given the discussions, I'd like to propose now
that
we
close in on a
"two lists - dev and user" - answer to this one. I
realize
there are
tradeoffs, but because we do have some users already
who
are
decidedly
non-developer types - and more coming - I'd like to
have
a
list "for
them"
that encourages them to be on it (by its topics and
volume).
Is there a
way we can/should bring this to a vote/decision by
those
that
get to
decide? (This will be our first case-study in a
post-joining-incubation
decision. :-))
Cheers,
Mike
On 4/24/15 5:46 AM, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 9:49 AM, Till Westmann
<
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
wrote:
I’m not completely sure that I want one. We
currently
have
one and
it has some reasonable traffic and the
discussions
are
at
a
user-level.
Also all developers are subscribed to the user-list,
so
developers
are aware of user problems but not necessarily
the
other
way
around.
I think that works pretty well, but maybe a single
list
would
work
better.
Thoughts from the other AsterixDB developers?
What about automatically generated
notifications,
like
Jira issues,
commit messages, etc.?
I wouldn't recommend to push those to a user
list?
Jochen
--
Any world that can produce the Taj Mahal, William Shakespeare,
and Stripe toothpaste can't be all bad. (C.R. MacNamara, One
Two
Three)
