Hi *, On Sun, Feb 20, 2005 at 06:43:25PM -0800, Jonathon Blake wrote: > Christian wrote: > > Don't mix up changes of the sourcecode and changes to the website. > > And where is your point? > > a) You'll also find the requests for chagnes to webpages filed there, > and a few more things
Sure. This is how it should be if you want to get these changes done. > b) The point is, it doesn't matter which part of OOo one offers > solutions to, it takes months, most trivial changes to take place. Please give (current) examples. > > The problem is that he waits for months instead of keeping nagging about it. > > Nagging is _not_ a solution, but an indication of _major_ problems > within the organization. It is just an indication that: people have other things to do as well and: people tend to forget things they are not remembered of. > > exagerrated! > > Go look at the issues about correcting the spelling on the webpages. > Two years is not uncommon. Go and show me these issues. > > You cannot expect others to do your work. > > Should an autoblaster be setup, to send a message everyday, for every > issue that simply needs a person who has the authority, and capability > to change a webpage, to do so? No. One will most likely not pay attention to automatic messages. > All the individual has to do is move things from one location to another. No, it is not all the individual has to do. The individual has to do many other things as well (not related to the single issue, but the overall workload of the individual). > > > In which country is there a problem with the licence that that material > > > is under? > > See the archives. IIRC correctly it even was japan > > Not an issue with Japanese Copyright law. So what? I already wrote that I may be wrong. Furthermore: I already mentioned these problem to show that daniel did not have to fight in this case to get an agreement on the inclusion. Everybody welcomed the idea of having cliparts. Those problems were the only concerns. > > > Or content of that site, for that matter > > ? Content of that site? What site, the whole OOo-site? > > have to do with cliparts? > > Clipart content --- you're the one who said that the content was an issue. Yes clipart content. But I do not understand what you mean by "of that site". Some of the contents causes problems in some countries. E.g. the flag with swastika. But I wrote as well that these are no problems that will block the integration of a subset of the cliparts. The flags and other things are easily removed and the licensing is not a blocker. > > Jean proved that this is possible! Why do you deny that? > > Jean had to be told what was wrong, first. No. She wrote: I cannot figure out what to enter in the Putty configuration and where. Nobody told her that she cannot figure out how to configure putty. > > Just name one single documentation that you can run through > > babelfish multibple times and that still is understandable. > > It takes a lot of time and editing in the English to get that result. > But I have done it before. So why don't you give an example? ciao Christian -- NP: Raging Speedhorn - Knives And Faces --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
