On Mon, 17 Nov 2003, Ian Holsman wrote: > I belive 2.0 beats 1.3 on these metrics, but like everyone here, Ihave > no more energy proving/disproving which is faster.. 2.0 works for me, > and thats all I really care about, not who else is using it.
Do you really believe this to be true for Apache2-prefork as well? It may be, I just have never seen any evidence of that in my own tests. Obviously both servers can easily fill a 100M connection when just serving up static files at which point it comes down to what sort of cpu load doing so puts on the server. I really don't see any compelling advantage of Apache2-prefork over Apache1 to justify the development costs involved in porting hundreds of modules. And I am not speaking with my PHP hat on here, by the way. And a threaded mpm is just not an option. Most humans are simply not smart enough to write threadsafe code. -Rasmus
