On Mon, 2006-11-13 at 13:56 -0500, Lars D. Noodén wrote: > OOo is also standalone, and complete. It does not have ties to an OS or > to a DRM server t ointroduce multiple opportunities for single point of > failure come and bite you.
Hmm maybe a little to esoteric for our target audience at this point. Let me think on that. I'm also a little concerned about saying "complete". As the frequent "Outlook" debates show, "complete" is a point of view on one hand and a moving target on the other. > > Maybe the phrase "unlike some of its competitors" could come out. Only > one product has that problem. Removing the reference would focus the > attention abck on OOo. Agreed, done. > > -Lars > Lars Noodén ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) > OpenOffice.org: Now ISO 26300 Standards Compliant ! > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- "GET LEGAL - GET OPENOFFICE.ORG" http://why.openoffice.org ISO 26300 compliant Graham Lauder, OpenOffice.org MarCon (Marketing Contact) NZ http://marketing.openoffice.org/contacts.html INGOTs Assessor Trainer (International Grades in Office Technologies) www.theingots.org.nz Get Dressed - Get OOoGear Gear for the well dressed OOo Advocate http://ooogear.co.nz --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
