Just curious why you think it’s a bad idea — you didn’t say? On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 12:49 PM Chen HY <chenhy12...@gmail.com> wrote:
> At least people needs a way to speak it. > Just define its pronunciation as "mix-net" or "m-x-net" and use the agreed > one everywhere helps a lot. > Changing name is a bad idea. > > 2018-04-11 20:29 GMT+01:00 Mu Li <muli....@gmail.com>: > > > Agree that MXNet, the combination of Minerva and CXXNet, which can be > > interpreted as mixed-net, is hard to be pronounced. But rebranding a name > > is a very big decision. We need a very carefully designed marketing plan > > for it. > > > > A choice is that we can gradually refer MXNet as a backend, and talk more > > about the frontend Gluon. > > > > On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 12:16 PM, Thomas DELTEIL < > > thomas.delte...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > FWIW Brainscript is actually a network definition language: > > > https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/cognitive-toolkit/ > > > BrainScript-Network-Builder > > > > > > > > > > > > Thomas > > > > > > > > > 2018-04-11 12:13 GMT-07:00 Chiyuan Zhang <plus...@gmail.com>: > > > > > > > IIRC CNTK renamed to something like brainscript which does not seem > to > > be > > > > very successful publicity campaign? > > > > > > > > Chiyuan > > > > > > > > On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 10:18 AM Chris Olivier < > cjolivie...@gmail.com> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Should we consider renaming MXNet to something more "friendly"? > > > > > > > > > > IMHO, I think this may be related to adoption problems. > > > > > > > > > > MXNet, CMTK -- both seem sort of sterile and hard to use, don't > they? > > > > > > > > > > Tensorflow, PyTorch, Caffe -- sound cool. > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Semt ftom m ipohne > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Chen Hanyang 陈涵洋 > Software School Fudan University > +86-138-1881-7745 >
