Nagy, I'm a simple user so the code base and license are completely irrelevant to me. What IS relevant is the way the software works. So, please, can you tell me half a dozen things that LO can do that OO cannot do?
I recently was given a 30,000 row excel sheet to read into a database so that I could use it with a Java front end. LO choked (version 18.104.22.168 on Linux), OO (version 4.1.2 on same machine) opened it perfectly and gave me a progress bar to indicate it was working. In my experience the LO writer user interface sucks -- badly. In my experience the LO calc interface has become almost as annoying as the MS Excel interface. And now, I hear, they are going to add that stupid "ribon" thingy to be even more annoying and counter-productive. So code quantity or quality aside, what can LO do for me as a common user? The Google "trend" you point to seems to indicate that people in Brazil and Arabia can't figure out how to use LO....says nothing about OO as far as I can tell except that OO is easier to use since the rest of the world isn't asking as many questions about it. Thanks for any insight you can provide. On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 12:30 AM, Nagy Ákos <a...@romkat.ro> wrote: > I wrote something that is not true? > About the trends: > https://www.google.com/trends/explore?q=openoffice,libreoffice > > >