On Wed, 7 Dec 2005, Phillip J. Eby wrote:
Did I miss anything?
Naming names. :) I don't think we're going to make any progress on our
organizational issues as long as knowledge of who the "offenders" are remains
private. We can only ponder the mysterious "they" who are breaking the rules
and wonder what all the fuss is about. (While a rotating sheriff duty would
certainly expose more people to the issues, it would not give them a viable
perspective on who the offenders are because of the small and infrequent
time-slicing.)
+1
So, if we are developing systems to enforce the rules, they should inform us
in an automated way as to who is not following them, if the system cannot
itself directly enforce the rule.
If I see my name, I'm less likely to ignore the messages. If the messages are
false positives, I will quickly learn to ignore those too.
Andi..
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Open Source Applications Foundation "Dev" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
