It seemed like there was consensus for automating the tasks a sheriff
would do. If the sheriff spent their time working on automation instead
of being sheriff, how long do you think it would be before we wouldn't
need a sheriff?
Heikki Toivonen wrote:
Andi Vajda wrote:
And still there are cases that I don't think can be automated, so I
don't see how humans could be completely eliminated from the loop.
In any case, building all of the infrastructure is going to take time.
We have a need for the sheriff now.
How about hiring one ?
Being a sheriff should normally take less than 20% of your work day,
even with the tools we have now. The time is somewhat scattered, though,
so you'd be limited in what you could do the rest of the time (assuming
you can't switch contexts fast). So I can't think of a way to justify
hiring anyone for that position when we can do it on a rotating duty
with such a minimal impact.
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Open Source Applications Foundation "Dev" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
|
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Open Source Applications Foundation "Dev" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
