We want to develop diversity community, never thought I'd see it dominated by single one vendor. john :-) Also this reason, we have drafted a new vendor-neutral spec for messaging and streaming solutions in 4.1.0 version.
Thanks for your link about review board. Let's take a closer look at it. > 在 2017年1月3日，19:50，John D. Ament <[email protected]> 写道： > > Not sure if it helps for CTR/RTC, ASF does host a review board instance ( > https://reviews.apache.org <https://reviews.apache.org/> ). > > Personally, I agree with Justin's sentiments about process. I do see a > number of projects that use RTC. They're generally projects dominated by a > single vendor. > > John > > On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 6:22 AM Von Gosling <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> 1. Refer to RTC or CTR problem >> >> For commit, may be, we could use CTR. For PR, we would prefer to RTC. We >> are high valuing the quality in RocketMQ. So, it is a better way to use the >> conservative strategy from my opinion :-) >> >> 2. Refer to PPMC and committer relationship >> Thanks Justin refers. We are not familiar with Apache recommended way for >> this problem. But i have learn about something about PMC additional >> responsibilities. IMO, we really want to keep the community diversity. >> Committer may be a good candidate for entering into PMC. For the same >> reason, contributor may be a good candidate for becoming Committer. >> >> AFAIK, Apache Tomcat have separate the PMC member and committer role. And, >> Apache Storm may regard as the committer as PMC member when someone make a >> great achievement for the project[1]. >> >> 1. http://storm.apache.org/contribute/People.html < >> http://storm.apache.org/contribute/People.html >> <http://storm.apache.org/contribute/People.html>> >> >> >> >>> 在 2017年1月3日，16:33，Justin Mclean <[email protected]> 写道： >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>>> IMO, not only the number of PR, more concerned about the quality of PR. >>> >>> Just try not to have the bar too high / wait too long to vote potential >> candidates in. This may discourage people being invoved and hinder >> community growth. But it’s totally up to this PPMC to decide this. >>> >>>> PPMC number of members should be less than the number of committer, >> IMHO, >>>> the committers are not all PPMC. >>> >>> Which is fine being a PPMC/PMC member had additional responsibilities [1] >>> >>>> RTC +1 The reference quality is the first priority. >>> >>> JFYI This is uncommon in Apache projects and all projects I have been >> involved in have been CTR. In CTR any commit is just a revert away. I’ve >> not seen many cases where it’s been an issue, especially where you have >> good test coverage and code quality metrics. But again it’s totally up to >> the PPMC to decide. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Justin >>> >>> 1. https://www.apache.org/dev/pmc.html#policy
