Hi, *"[1] Is it just a few pull requests and some interaction on the mailing list or perhaps something more? This varies from project to project. I think it's likely we have a couple of potential candidates given the number of PRs so far. Also do we want PPMC == committers or not?"*
IMO, not only the number of PR, more concerned about the quality of PR. PR quality is more difficult to quantify, I believe that PPMC members are very professional people, through the discussion together, we will eventually be able to select the valuable committers. PPMC number of members should be less than the number of committer, IMHO, the committers are not all PPMC. *"[2] One other thing to consider is do we want the project to be CTR (commit then review) or RTC (review then commit). * *It currently seems a little more RTC than CTR to me?"* RTC +1 The reference quality is the first priority. Regards vintagewang On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 3:08 PM, Justin Mclean <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > It’s probably easier to reply here and edit a wiki page if you don’t have > access. > > Re three issues towards graduation I would list these, but there may be > others. > 1. Confirm the IP review is complete. > 2. Make our first Apache release > 3. Vote in our first committer / PMC members > > For the 3rd point we should probably have a discussion on this list on > what does someone need to do in order to be considered a committer. [1] Is > it just a few pull requests and some interaction on the mailing list or > perhaps something more? This varies from project to project. I think it's > likely we have a couple of potential candidates given the number of PRs so > far. Also do we want PPMC == committers or not? > > One other thing to consider is do we want the project to be CTR (commit > then review) or RTC (review then commit). [2] It currently seems a little > more RTC than CTR to me? > > Thank, > Justin > > 1. http://incubator.apache.org/guides/ppmc.html (see Adding New > Committers) > 2. https://www.apache.org/foundation/glossary.html#CommitThenReview
