To clarify this even further:
The Geronimo Server is now officially dead.
But the Geronimo project is not. It alredy contains quite a few modular parts
which are reused in many ASF projects and also outside.
Examples is the geronimo-transaction-manager, geronimo-javamail,
geronimo-config, xbean-finder, etc
Of course it would probably make sense to fold those 2 projects together, as
already discussed in the past.
I'm still all open to it, but I have an important criterium to fulfil:
If we move those portable parts to TomEE, then this would mean that TomEE would
become an 'Umbrella project'.
And further that we would need a new name for those portable parts.
They would effectively be mainatained by the TomEE community (which has a big
overlap with Geronimo anyway) but those parts must clearly be recognized
separately from TomEE.
Otherwise people will assume that those parts only work within TomEE - where in
reality they would even work on WildFly or Liberty, etc. or even a naked Tomcat.
We might e.g. brand them as 'TomEE Geronimo Spare Parts Department' :)
PS: I'd also love to keep the org.apache.geronimo package name to ease backward
> Am 02.02.2018 um 11:08 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com>:
> 2018-02-02 11:05 GMT+01:00 Otávio Gonçalves de Santana <
>> Guys, I have a question:
>> Why not a project to each implementation?
> this is the case but geronimo is used as an umbrella project.
>> This way I can use just a specific if I want also.
> exactly the goal and user usage AFAIK ;)
> long story short: we learnt from the past errors and since always the same
> people work on these projects it is better to not split it accross N
> communities since
> it leads to a lot of efforts for these people. Having a single umbrella
> project with N subprojects reduces the administrative work etc and enhance
> the projects productivity.
>> On Fri, Feb 2, 2018 at 7:44 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com>
>>> Hi JL,
>>> Microprofile apache effort is hosted in geronimo and John already spoke
>>> about it I think. Would probably saner to keep it all at the same place
>>> the foundation.
>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/
>>> rmannibucau> |
>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
>>> 2018-02-02 9:39 GMT+01:00 Jean-Louis Monteiro <jlmonte...@tomitribe.com
>>>> Hi all,
>>>> I was wondering if we could have the Microprofile JWT implemented in
>>>> What do you think?
>>>> I was reading the spec and I'd like to contribute that in.
>>>> Jean-Louis Monteiro