Hi, Ok thanks guys. @Rudy, you are most welcome :)
-- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com On Fri, Feb 2, 2018 at 11:39 AM, Rudy De Busscher <rdebussc...@gmail.com> wrote: > I think it is a very important spec, also for non-microprofile > implementations as it can enhance the interoperability of all servers. > > I'm also very interested in the implementation (and want to help a bit with > it also :) ) > > regards > Rudy > > > > On 2 February 2018 at 11:23, Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de.invalid> > wrote: > > > To clarify this even further: > > The Geronimo Server is now officially dead. > > But the Geronimo project is not. It alredy contains quite a few modular > > parts which are reused in many ASF projects and also outside. > > Examples is the geronimo-transaction-manager, geronimo-javamail, > > geronimo-config, xbean-finder, etc > > > > Of course it would probably make sense to fold those 2 projects together, > > as already discussed in the past. > > I'm still all open to it, but I have an important criterium to fulfil: > > If we move those portable parts to TomEE, then this would mean that TomEE > > would become an 'Umbrella project'. > > And further that we would need a new name for those portable parts. > > They would effectively be mainatained by the TomEE community (which has a > > big overlap with Geronimo anyway) but those parts must clearly be > > recognized separately from TomEE. > > > > Otherwise people will assume that those parts only work within TomEE - > > where in reality they would even work on WildFly or Liberty, etc. or > even a > > naked Tomcat. > > Got me? > > > > We might e.g. brand them as 'TomEE Geronimo Spare Parts Department' :) > > > > LieGrue, > > strub > > > > PS: I'd also love to keep the org.apache.geronimo package name to ease > > backward compatibility. > > > > > > > Am 02.02.2018 um 11:08 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau < > rmannibu...@gmail.com > > >: > > > > > > 2018-02-02 11:05 GMT+01:00 Otávio Gonçalves de Santana < > > > osant...@tomitribe.com>: > > > > > >> Guys, I have a question: > > >> > > >> Why not a project to each implementation? > > >> > > > > > > this is the case but geronimo is used as an umbrella project. > > > > > > > > >> This way I can use just a specific if I want also. > > >> > > > > > > exactly the goal and user usage AFAIK ;) > > > > > > long story short: we learnt from the past errors and since always the > > same > > > people work on these projects it is better to not split it accross N > > > communities since > > > it leads to a lot of efforts for these people. Having a single umbrella > > > project with N subprojects reduces the administrative work etc and > > enhance > > > the projects productivity. > > > > > > > > >> On Fri, Feb 2, 2018 at 7:44 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau < > > rmannibu...@gmail.com> > > >> wrote: > > >> > > >>> Hi JL, > > >>> > > >>> Microprofile apache effort is hosted in geronimo and John already > spoke > > >>> about it I think. Would probably saner to keep it all at the same > place > > >> for > > >>> the foundation. > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> Romain Manni-Bucau > > >>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog > > >>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog > > >>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/ > > >>> rmannibucau> | > > >>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book > > >>> <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java- > > >>> ee-8-high-performance> > > >>> > > >>> 2018-02-02 9:39 GMT+01:00 Jean-Louis Monteiro < > > jlmonte...@tomitribe.com > > >>> : > > >>> > > >>>> Hi all, > > >>>> > > >>>> I was wondering if we could have the Microprofile JWT implemented in > > >>> TomEE. > > >>>> What do you think? > > >>>> > > >>>> I was reading the spec and I'd like to contribute that in. > > >>>> > > >>>> Jean-Louis > > >>>> > > >>>> -- > > >>>> Jean-Louis Monteiro > > >>>> http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro > > >>>> http://www.tomitribe.com > > >>>> > > >>> > > >> > > > > >
