I'll apologize for not doing more on TomEE 8. But that is simply a time thing, and not a Tomitribe thing. I still owe a fixed build on master (which I am working on tonight) and forward porting the latest master patches to the EE8 branch. That work is not forgotten, just has to be fitted in with everything else.
I'm not sure where your Tomitribe-related assumptions are coming from, and they do not seem accurate or fair. My opinion, is my opinion, and it should still count, irrespective of who employs me. I think the commit was simply an error, and not a deliberate attempt to circumvent conversation. Jon On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 8:44 PM, Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de.invalid> wrote: > Well, let's be a bit more specific. > a.) > No, Geronimo of course does not have have a monopoly on creating > microprofile implementations at the ASF. Nor does TomEE. > Geronimo a good place for reusable JavaEE parts though. And G started to > implement Microprofile specifications 2 years ago already. There is already > quite a lot in existence over there. You really should take a look over the > fence. > > Instead of duplicating the work which is already done I would prefer if > some folks would help with more important tasks. E.g. finally finishing > TomEE8. Romain and I have so far been the ONLY ones working on that effort > for the whole last year. > b.) > I understand it is not the most convenient for tomitribe which > probably > > perfers to own the full project(s) Tomitribe itself does not own TomEE > nor created it, etc.The actual core part of TomEE (OpenEJB) is acually only > a fraction of what the whole project is.It's an excellent aggregator > project. But if you count in all the other parts which were needed to > create TomEE7 and 8, then the whole sum is about 20 times the size of > openejb: tomcat, openwebbeans, bval, johnzon, geronimo-tx, > geronimo-javamail, geronimo-specs, cxf, activemq, openjpa, MyFaces, etc etc > Each of those projects has at > > c.) There have been a lot of talks about moving the reusable parts of > Geronimo under the umbrella of the TomEE project. That would be perfectly > fine. But I iterate it once again. There are 2 tasks to do before we can go > on: > 1.) TomEE needs to become an umbrella project2.) the name of the reusable > components must be clearly separated from the TomEE Application > Server.Otherwise TomEE will hit the same problems like Geronimo and MyFaces > had - that people would not identify those components as being totally > independent of the TomEE application server and separately usable. > > > LieGrue,strub > > > > On Monday, 12 February 2018, 21:20:57 CET, Romain Manni-Bucau < > rmannibu...@gmail.com> wrote: > > No Andy, as mentionned in the discussion Geronimo hosts the microprofile > @asf. This is why jwt should probably be done in geronimo which is the asf > ee related project umbrella. > > I understand it is not the most convenient for tomitribe which probably > perfers to own the full project(s) but as a foundation member I d really > like to not let company details pollute projects. > > Also the discussion made clear to not do it in current repo whatever > project is used as umbrella so we should revert that and finish the > discussion before any action to not kill tomee project by a hard company > driven management making it no more in the OSS spirit. > > Le 12 févr. 2018 21:14, "Andy Gumbrecht" <agumbre...@tomitribe.com> a > écrit : > > > "Parts of the components skeletons you just created" > > > > They're just logically named empty modules for pending work? > > > > > > On 12/02/18 20:42, Mark Struberg wrote: > > > >> And what's that for? > >> > >> Is there any behind the scene stuff going on at Tomitribe or can we > >> finally get back to discussing such things on the Apache lists? > >> > >> Before we go on I'd would first finish the discussion how we want to > turn > >> TomEE into an umbrella project or how the structure would be. And > >> whether/how we want to integrate the modular Geronimo parts into one > >> project or not. > >> > >> Parts of the components skeletons you just created do already exist at > >> the ASF. > >> > >> LieGrue, > >> strub > >> > >> > >> > >> On Monday, 12 February 2018, 20:22:53 CET, Andy Gumbrecht < > >> agumbre...@tomitribe.com> wrote: > >> > >> > >> Added project stubs: > >> https://github.com/apache/tomee/tree/master/microprofile > >> > >> Andy. > >> > >> > >> On 05/02/18 11:17, Jean-Louis Monteiro wrote: > >> > Hi, > >> > > >> > Ok thanks guys. > >> > @Rudy, you are most welcome :) > >> > > >> > -- > >> > Jean-Louis Monteiro > >> > http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro > >> > http://www.tomitribe.com > >> > > >> > On Fri, Feb 2, 2018 at 11:39 AM, Rudy De Busscher < > >> rdebussc...@gmail.com <mailto:rdebussc...@gmail.com>> > >> > wrote: > >> > > >> >> I think it is a very important spec, also for non-microprofile > >> >> implementations as it can enhance the interoperability of all > servers. > >> >> > >> >> I'm also very interested in the implementation (and want to help a > bit > >> with > >> >> it also :) ) > >> >> > >> >> regards > >> >> Rudy > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> On 2 February 2018 at 11:23, Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de.invalid > >> <mailto:strub...@yahoo.de.invalid>> > >> >> wrote: > >> >> > >> >>> To clarify this even further: > >> >>> The Geronimo Server is now officially dead. > >> >>> But the Geronimo project is not. It alredy contains quite a few > >> modular > >> >>> parts which are reused in many ASF projects and also outside. > >> >>> Examples is the geronimo-transaction-manager, geronimo-javamail, > >> >>> geronimo-config, xbean-finder, etc > >> >>> > >> >>> Of course it would probably make sense to fold those 2 projects > >> together, > >> >>> as already discussed in the past. > >> >>> I'm still all open to it, but I have an important criterium to > fulfil: > >> >>> If we move those portable parts to TomEE, then this would mean that > >> TomEE > >> >>> would become an 'Umbrella project'. > >> >>> And further that we would need a new name for those portable parts. > >> >>> They would effectively be mainatained by the TomEE community (which > >> has a > >> >>> big overlap with Geronimo anyway) but those parts must clearly be > >> >>> recognized separately from TomEE. > >> >>> > >> >>> Otherwise people will assume that those parts only work within > TomEE - > >> >>> where in reality they would even work on WildFly or Liberty, etc. or > >> >> even a > >> >>> naked Tomcat. > >> >>> Got me? > >> >>> > >> >>> We might e.g. brand them as 'TomEE Geronimo Spare Parts Department' > :) > >> >>> > >> >>> LieGrue, > >> >>> strub > >> >>> > >> >>> PS: I'd also love to keep the org.apache.geronimo package name to > ease > >> >>> backward compatibility. > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>>> Am 02.02.2018 um 11:08 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau < > >> >> rmannibu...@gmail.com <mailto:rmannibu...@gmail.com> > >> >>>> : > >> >>>> > >> >>>> 2018-02-02 11:05 GMT+01:00 Otávio Gonçalves de Santana < > >> >>>> osant...@tomitribe.com <mailto:osant...@tomitribe.com>>: > >> >>>> > >> >>>>> Guys, I have a question: > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> Why not a project to each implementation? > >> >>>>> > >> >>>> this is the case but geronimo is used as an umbrella project. > >> >>>> > >> >>>> > >> >>>>> This way I can use just a specific if I want also. > >> >>>>> > >> >>>> exactly the goal and user usage AFAIK ;) > >> >>>> > >> >>>> long story short: we learnt from the past errors and since always > the > >> >>> same > >> >>>> people work on these projects it is better to not split it accross > N > >> >>>> communities since > >> >>>> it leads to a lot of efforts for these people. Having a single > >> umbrella > >> >>>> project with N subprojects reduces the administrative work etc and > >> >>> enhance > >> >>>> the projects productivity. > >> >>>> > >> >>>> > >> >>>>> On Fri, Feb 2, 2018 at 7:44 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau < > >> >>> rmannibu...@gmail.com <mailto:rmannibu...@gmail.com>> > >> >>>>> wrote: > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>>> Hi JL, > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>> Microprofile apache effort is hosted in geronimo and John already > >> >> spoke > >> >>>>>> about it I think. Would probably saner to keep it all at the same > >> >> place > >> >>>>> for > >> >>>>>> the foundation. > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau > >> >>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog > >> >>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog > >> >>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/ > >> >>>>>> rmannibucau> | > >> >>>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book > >> >>>>>> <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java- > >> >>>>>> ee-8-high-performance> > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>> 2018-02-02 9:39 GMT+01:00 Jean-Louis Monteiro < > >> >>> jlmonte...@tomitribe.com <mailto:jlmonte...@tomitribe.com> > >> >>>>>> : > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> Hi all, > >> >>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> I was wondering if we could have the Microprofile JWT > implemented > >> in > >> >>>>>> TomEE. > >> >>>>>>> What do you think? > >> >>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> I was reading the spec and I'd like to contribute that in. > >> >>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> Jean-Louis > >> >>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> -- > >> >>>>>>> Jean-Louis Monteiro > >> >>>>>>> http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro > >> >>>>>>> http://www.tomitribe.com > >> >>>>>>> > >> >>> > >> > >> -- > >> Andy Gumbrecht > >> https://twitter.com/AndyGeeDe > >> > >> http://www.tomitribe.com > >> > >> https://www.tomitribe.io > >> > >> > >> Ubique > >> > >> > >> > > -- > > Andy Gumbrecht > > https://twitter.com/AndyGeeDe > > http://www.tomitribe.com > > https://www.tomitribe.io > > > > > > Ubique > > > > >
