Hi
On 2007-03-18, at 09:41 , :murb: [[maarten brouwers]] wrote:
Hi,
I was trying to write an e-mail where I was comparing our website
to that of others... and then I got it :D (imho): We should simply
rename Projects to Developers and change maybe a bit of the
wording. What do you want to do. Why? Well, you want people there
where they feel they can contribute the most to something they want
to do themselves. So where to start... well euh... contributing?
Too broad... and there the project page comes in to place.
Projects as a main menu item is not common at websites I've been
looking at (see below), and the developer-pages are often trying to
explain in what directions one can contribute... quite an overlap
with our projects page right?
g.,
Maarten
I'm trying to think why this is a bad idea. :-)... and failing. The
Projects page (modulo Kay et al.) could work, with some additions as
I've suggested. The concern is information duplication and the
outdating of links, etc. Hence, the idea of minimal links--in this
case, to projects plus pages on the wiki plus bug reporting.
So, let's say that Projects becomes "Developers". I think that is
feasible with the Collabnet application but I'd have to double
check. "Projects" is used by CEE a lot, and there may be hidden calls.
If it becomes "Developers" we could also at some point do what Moz.
does and have "Products"--which I want, anyway, once we have
them. :-) (We could do that anyway of course.) These would include
not just the binaries but but also extensions. "Products" would
clearly indicate to users that the things there are finished and are
for enduse.
best
louis
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
