Guys, The agenda as it exists now is already going to be more than we could hope to discuss in 3 meetings... We're going to need to massively narrow the focus if there's going to be any hope of getting anywhere.
-Eric On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 9:20 AM, Adrian Godoroja <robot...@me.com> wrote: > Hi, > we've created a wiki page for our future meeting > at http://trac.adium.im/wiki/AdiumMeetings/2011-08-xx > We don't have a stable date/time yet. > Feel free to add topics to Agenda. > Thanks, > Adrian. > On Jul 27, 2011, at 20:41 , Patrick Steinhardt wrote: > > I just want to prevent it being pushed to nowhen, which could happen very > fast. > What are you guys thinking about regular meetings? Nothing required for all > developers to attend but I guess this would help to solve the > communication-issue Eric mentioned. I think about once every one or two > months. > I thought most active developers already knew me, but if you ask for it - > why not? I'll do this in the next days. > Patrick > > On Jul 27, 2011, at 5:34 PM, Christopher Forsythe <ch...@growl.info> wrote: > > Is there a ticket on the preferences reduction, a wiki page, or any > information about it? How about mockups? I can see that topic taking 5 days > in a meeting if there is no direction. It's a rather blanket topic "hey > let's reduce the preferences I don't like!" with no reasoning behind it. > Beyond that, my guess is that a lot of users don't even look at preferences > very much, so is there something quantitative (i.e. that you can measure) > saying how many users actually even open preferences more than once for > instance, and where they go? > I was under the impression that everyone here had a firm understanding that > 1.4.3 is coming out soon, and that 1.5 was going to beta right after that. > Are these the only topics you wanted to discuss? If so I'd consider being a > bit more patient about everyone's schedules. I'd even consider that topics 1 > and 2 could be discussed politely via this very mailing list, and that topic > 3 could wait until a meeting with more pressing matters. > Also, perhaps it's a good idea to introduce yourself to the group (in a new > thread). > Chris > > On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 9:40 AM, Patrick Steinhardt <steinhard...@me.com> > wrote: >> >> I have no objections to next week but one. But I don't want to push it >> even further. >> >> Patrick >> >> >> On Jul 27, 2011, at 4:36 PM, Eric Richie wrote: >> >> > I'm not available next week. I could do the following week though. >> > >> > -Eric >> > >> > On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 10:20 AM, Patrick Steinhard >> > <steinhard...@me.com> wrote: >> >> Hey all, >> >> >> >> as a meeting is definitely overdue I want to propose one next week >> >> (beginning with 01.08.2011). As I'll have no time on monday and tuesday I >> >> vote for wednesday, but that's open for discussion. >> >> Topics would include at least the following: >> >> >> >> 1. 1.4.3 release >> >> 2. 1.5 release schedule >> >> 3. preference reduction >> >> >> >> Please express your opinions on date and topics. >> >> >> >> Regards, >> >> Patrick >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> > > >
