I don't think 30 minutes will be enough, I would plead for an hour. But as time passes by we will gather some experience and draw our conclusions of this. :)
Patrick On Jul 29, 2011, at 12:49 AM, Jordan wrote: > I think Colin's suggestion for more than one meeting would be best. Normally > these things proceed for well over 2 hours, which is quite a length of time, > especially considering it's very late at night for some tuning in and that > many attendees have not even stuck around that long in the past. > > Trying to break it up into 30-45 minute meetings covering defined topics in > each is likely going to be better for everyone. Those who want to discuss a > particular topic won't have to wade through hours of other material, those > who are up late to attend will not have to extend that into wee hours of the > night, and we're likely to get more focused arguments and results from a > shorter meeting than a ridiculously long one. > > Jordan
