What's the holdup on deciding a time?

Also, is it possible to have one on 8/1 and having another one on 8/15? We 
really do have a TON of stuff to discuss. (We really should be holding these 
regularly.)

-Colin

On Jul 28, 2011, at 10:21 AM, Eric Richie wrote:

> Guys,
> 
> The agenda as it exists now is already going to be more than we could
> hope to discuss in 3 meetings... We're going to need to massively
> narrow the focus if there's going to be any hope of getting anywhere.
> 
> -Eric
> 
> On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 9:20 AM, Adrian Godoroja <robot...@me.com> wrote:
>> Hi,
>> we've created a wiki page for our future meeting
>> at http://trac.adium.im/wiki/AdiumMeetings/2011-08-xx
>> We don't have a stable date/time yet.
>> Feel free to add topics to Agenda.
>> Thanks,
>> Adrian.
>> On Jul 27, 2011, at 20:41 , Patrick Steinhardt wrote:
>> 
>> I just want to prevent it being pushed to nowhen, which could happen very
>> fast.
>> What are you guys thinking about regular meetings? Nothing required for all
>> developers to attend but I guess this would help to solve the
>> communication-issue Eric mentioned. I think about once every one or two
>> months.
>> I thought most active developers already knew me, but if you ask for it -
>> why not? I'll do this in the next days.
>> Patrick
>> 
>> On Jul 27, 2011, at 5:34 PM, Christopher Forsythe <ch...@growl.info> wrote:
>> 
>> Is there a ticket on the preferences reduction, a wiki page, or any
>> information about it? How about mockups? I can see that topic taking 5 days
>> in a meeting if there is no direction. It's a rather blanket topic "hey
>> let's reduce the preferences I don't like!" with no reasoning behind it.
>> Beyond that, my guess is that a lot of users don't even look at preferences
>> very much, so is there something quantitative (i.e. that you can measure)
>> saying how many users actually even open preferences more than once for
>> instance, and where they go?
>> I was under the impression that everyone here had a firm understanding that
>> 1.4.3 is coming out soon, and that 1.5 was going to beta right after that.
>> Are these the only topics you wanted to discuss? If so I'd consider being a
>> bit more patient about everyone's schedules. I'd even consider that topics 1
>> and 2 could be discussed politely via this very mailing list, and that topic
>> 3 could wait until a meeting with more pressing matters.
>> Also, perhaps it's a good idea to introduce yourself to the group (in a new
>> thread).
>> Chris
>> 
>> On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 9:40 AM, Patrick Steinhardt <steinhard...@me.com>
>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> I have no objections to next week but one. But I don't want to push it
>>> even further.
>>> 
>>> Patrick
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Jul 27, 2011, at 4:36 PM, Eric Richie wrote:
>>> 
>>>> I'm not available next week. I could do the following week though.
>>>> 
>>>> -Eric
>>>> 
>>>> On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 10:20 AM, Patrick Steinhard
>>>> <steinhard...@me.com> wrote:
>>>>> Hey all,
>>>>> 
>>>>> as a meeting is definitely overdue I want to propose one next week
>>>>> (beginning with 01.08.2011). As I'll have no time on monday and tuesday I
>>>>> vote for wednesday, but that's open for discussion.
>>>>> Topics would include at least the following:
>>>>> 
>>>>>        1. 1.4.3 release
>>>>>        2. 1.5 release schedule
>>>>>        3. preference reduction
>>>>> 
>>>>> Please express your opinions on date and topics.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> Patrick
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 


Reply via email to