What's the holdup on deciding a time? Also, is it possible to have one on 8/1 and having another one on 8/15? We really do have a TON of stuff to discuss. (We really should be holding these regularly.)
-Colin On Jul 28, 2011, at 10:21 AM, Eric Richie wrote: > Guys, > > The agenda as it exists now is already going to be more than we could > hope to discuss in 3 meetings... We're going to need to massively > narrow the focus if there's going to be any hope of getting anywhere. > > -Eric > > On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 9:20 AM, Adrian Godoroja <robot...@me.com> wrote: >> Hi, >> we've created a wiki page for our future meeting >> at http://trac.adium.im/wiki/AdiumMeetings/2011-08-xx >> We don't have a stable date/time yet. >> Feel free to add topics to Agenda. >> Thanks, >> Adrian. >> On Jul 27, 2011, at 20:41 , Patrick Steinhardt wrote: >> >> I just want to prevent it being pushed to nowhen, which could happen very >> fast. >> What are you guys thinking about regular meetings? Nothing required for all >> developers to attend but I guess this would help to solve the >> communication-issue Eric mentioned. I think about once every one or two >> months. >> I thought most active developers already knew me, but if you ask for it - >> why not? I'll do this in the next days. >> Patrick >> >> On Jul 27, 2011, at 5:34 PM, Christopher Forsythe <ch...@growl.info> wrote: >> >> Is there a ticket on the preferences reduction, a wiki page, or any >> information about it? How about mockups? I can see that topic taking 5 days >> in a meeting if there is no direction. It's a rather blanket topic "hey >> let's reduce the preferences I don't like!" with no reasoning behind it. >> Beyond that, my guess is that a lot of users don't even look at preferences >> very much, so is there something quantitative (i.e. that you can measure) >> saying how many users actually even open preferences more than once for >> instance, and where they go? >> I was under the impression that everyone here had a firm understanding that >> 1.4.3 is coming out soon, and that 1.5 was going to beta right after that. >> Are these the only topics you wanted to discuss? If so I'd consider being a >> bit more patient about everyone's schedules. I'd even consider that topics 1 >> and 2 could be discussed politely via this very mailing list, and that topic >> 3 could wait until a meeting with more pressing matters. >> Also, perhaps it's a good idea to introduce yourself to the group (in a new >> thread). >> Chris >> >> On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 9:40 AM, Patrick Steinhardt <steinhard...@me.com> >> wrote: >>> >>> I have no objections to next week but one. But I don't want to push it >>> even further. >>> >>> Patrick >>> >>> >>> On Jul 27, 2011, at 4:36 PM, Eric Richie wrote: >>> >>>> I'm not available next week. I could do the following week though. >>>> >>>> -Eric >>>> >>>> On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 10:20 AM, Patrick Steinhard >>>> <steinhard...@me.com> wrote: >>>>> Hey all, >>>>> >>>>> as a meeting is definitely overdue I want to propose one next week >>>>> (beginning with 01.08.2011). As I'll have no time on monday and tuesday I >>>>> vote for wednesday, but that's open for discussion. >>>>> Topics would include at least the following: >>>>> >>>>> 1. 1.4.3 release >>>>> 2. 1.5 release schedule >>>>> 3. preference reduction >>>>> >>>>> Please express your opinions on date and topics. >>>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> Patrick >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >