+1 to this suggestion

On Jul 28, 2011, at 4:49 PM, Jordan <jas8...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I think Colin's suggestion for more than one meeting would be best. Normally 
> these things proceed for well over 2 hours, which is quite a length of time, 
> especially considering it's very late at night for some tuning in and that 
> many attendees have not even stuck around that long in the past.
> 
> Trying to break it up into 30-45 minute meetings covering defined topics in 
> each is likely going to be better for everyone. Those who want to discuss a 
> particular topic won't have to wade through hours of other material, those 
> who are up late to attend will not have to extend that into wee hours of the 
> night, and we're likely to get more focused arguments and results from a 
> shorter meeting than a ridiculously long one.
> 
> Jordan
> 
> ----
> Sent with Sparrow
> 
> On Thursday, 28 July, 2011 at 6:31 PM, Colin Barrett wrote:
> 
>> What's the holdup on deciding a time?
>> 
>> Also, is it possible to have one on 8/1 and having another one on 8/15? We 
>> really do have a TON of stuff to discuss. (We really should be holding these 
>> regularly.)
>> 
>> -Colin
>> 
>> On Jul 28, 2011, at 10:21 AM, Eric Richie wrote:
>> 
>>> Guys,
>>> 
>>> The agenda as it exists now is already going to be more than we could
>>> hope to discuss in 3 meetings... We're going to need to massively
>>> narrow the focus if there's going to be any hope of getting anywhere.
>>> 
>>> -Eric
>>> 
>>> On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 9:20 AM, Adrian Godoroja <robot...@me.com> wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>> we've created a wiki page for our future meeting
>>>> at http://trac.adium.im/wiki/AdiumMeetings/2011-08-xx
>>>> We don't have a stable date/time yet.
>>>> Feel free to add topics to Agenda.
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Adrian.
>>>> On Jul 27, 2011, at 20:41 , Patrick Steinhardt wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> I just want to prevent it being pushed to nowhen, which could happen very
>>>> fast.
>>>> What are you guys thinking about regular meetings? Nothing required for all
>>>> developers to attend but I guess this would help to solve the
>>>> communication-issue Eric mentioned. I think about once every one or two
>>>> months.
>>>> I thought most active developers already knew me, but if you ask for it -
>>>> why not? I'll do this in the next days.
>>>> Patrick
>>>> 
>>>> On Jul 27, 2011, at 5:34 PM, Christopher Forsythe <ch...@growl.info> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Is there a ticket on the preferences reduction, a wiki page, or any
>>>> information about it? How about mockups? I can see that topic taking 5 days
>>>> in a meeting if there is no direction. It's a rather blanket topic "hey
>>>> let's reduce the preferences I don't like!" with no reasoning behind it.
>>>> Beyond that, my guess is that a lot of users don't even look at preferences
>>>> very much, so is there something quantitative (i.e. that you can measure)
>>>> saying how many users actually even open preferences more than once for
>>>> instance, and where they go?
>>>> I was under the impression that everyone here had a firm understanding that
>>>> 1.4.3 is coming out soon, and that 1.5 was going to beta right after that.
>>>> Are these the only topics you wanted to discuss? If so I'd consider being a
>>>> bit more patient about everyone's schedules. I'd even consider that topics 
>>>> 1
>>>> and 2 could be discussed politely via this very mailing list, and that 
>>>> topic
>>>> 3 could wait until a meeting with more pressing matters.
>>>> Also, perhaps it's a good idea to introduce yourself to the group (in a new
>>>> thread).
>>>> Chris
>>>> 
>>>> On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 9:40 AM, Patrick Steinhardt <steinhard...@me.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> I have no objections to next week but one. But I don't want to push it
>>>>> even further.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Patrick
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Jul 27, 2011, at 4:36 PM, Eric Richie wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> I'm not available next week. I could do the following week though.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> -Eric
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 10:20 AM, Patrick Steinhard
>>>>>> <steinhard...@me.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> Hey all,
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> as a meeting is definitely overdue I want to propose one next week
>>>>>>> (beginning with 01.08.2011). As I'll have no time on monday and tuesday 
>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>> vote for wednesday, but that's open for discussion.
>>>>>>> Topics would include at least the following:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 1. 1.4.3 release
>>>>>>> 2. 1.5 release schedule
>>>>>>> 3. preference reduction
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Please express your opinions on date and topics.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>> Patrick
>> 
> 

Reply via email to