On Thu, Oct 04, 2018 at 08:35:20PM +0200, Timothée Floure wrote: > > We have had a long discussion about hibernate (suspend to disk) > > being unreliable. But there seems to be no hard data. Let's gather > > some! > > I might have missed something, but can you link me the "long discussion"? Do > we > have a page on the subject somewhere on the wiki?
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/desk...@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/AUHETMQF6VIL6SG4VZXA4GQB43BAW7NJ/ "Disable (or make configurable and default to off) suspend-then-hibernate behavior in GNOME-3.30" https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/desk...@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/TLTA6HAYJWQYHV3ZHFXUIXM4IJVWBEJJ/ "Disabling kernel's hibernate support by default, allow re-enabling it with a kernel cmdline option" https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/desk...@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/YOTPDRPY6ZTFGVCPMFWGPA3KRDNFHLOD/ "system now hibernates automatically 3 hours after suspend ?" (note that those are cross-posted to kernel@fp.o, sometimes fedora-devel@fp.o, so it's a bit a thicket to navigate.) > > If you perform hibernation (systemctl hibernate, or the equivalent > > through the GUI), does _your_ system suspend and resume correctly? > > Works perfectly on my T440s :-) Cool. Zbyszek _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
