On Sun, Sep 27, 2026 at 02:32:20PM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Sat, Sep 26, 2026 at 6:28 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Fri, Sep 11, 2026 at 12:57:56AM +0200, Miro Hrončok via devel wrote: > > > This time I got 17 issues 😱 > > > > > > Problem 1: problem with installed package > > > - python3-bitstring-4.1.4-10.fc43.noarch does not belong to a > > > distupgrade > > > repository > > > - nothing provides (python3.15dist(bitarray) < 3~~ with > > > python3.15dist(bitarray) >= 2.8) needed by > > > python3-bitstring-4.1.4-13.fc45.noarch from fedora > > > > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2513926 > > > > I merged your PRs and submitted an update. It just needs karma now: > > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2026-bc0ec508a1 > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > Problem 2: installed package cheese-2:44.1-10.fc43.x86_64 requires > > > libgnome-desktop-3.so.20()(64bit), but none of the providers can be > > > installed > > > - gnome-desktop3-44.5-1.fc43.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade > > > repository > > > - problem with installed package > > > > > > cheese was retired with "Archived upstream, obsoleted by Snapshot", but > > > nothing obsoletes that package. Should it be snapshot or > > > fedora-obsolete-packages? > > > > snapshot IMO. The package is owned by rust-sig, so I submitted an update > > that adds the Obsoletes. > > Can people please stop making changes like this before talking with each > other?? > > I responded two weeks ago that I'd fix the upgrade path for > libgit2_1.8 and cheese, but: > > Both were addressed in fedora-obsolete-packages without consulting the > package maintainers of either libgit2_1.9 or snapshot, resulting in > first 1) me adding Obsoletes to libgit2_1.9 unnecessarily, and now 2) > you adding Obsoletes to snapshot unnecessarily.
I think such situations are unavoidable… Not everybody can catch and remember every message on fedora-devel. If all that happened is that we ended up with an unnecessary rebuild of a package, I think that's OK. Zbyszek -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://forge.fedoraproject.org/infra/tickets/issues/new
