On Thu, 2026-09-24 at 03:43 +0000, Gary Buhrmaster wrote: > On Thu, Sep 10, 2026 at 10:58 PM Miro Hrončok via devel > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Problem 5: installed package openssl-devel-engine-1:3.5.7-2.fc43.x86_64 > > requires openssl-devel(x86-64) = 1:3.5.7-2.fc43, but none of the providers > > can > > be installed > > - openssl-devel-1:3.5.7-2.fc43.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade > > repository > > - problem with installed package > > > > Something needs to obsolete this. openssl-devel maybe? > > openssl-devel-engine is now openssl3-devel-engine > (which also depends on openssl3-devel). for the > openssl3 compatibility rpms. > > I am not entirely sure how that needs to be > reflected in obsoletes and provides, but I > presume some of the various rpm experts > will know the correct incantations to make > everything just work.
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=3096308 shows: * Tue Sep 08 2026 Dmitry Belyavskiy <[email protected]> - 1:4.0.2-2 - Obsolete openssl-devel-engine explicitly Resolves: rhbz#2527847 but...it might actually have been better to have openssl3-devel-engine obsolete and provide openssl-devel-engine, since it's possible people who have it installed still want/need openssl 3 engine devel headers. -- Adam Williamson (he/him/his) Fedora QA Fedora Chat: @adamwill:fedora.im | Mastodon: @[email protected] https://www.happyassassin.net -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://forge.fedoraproject.org/infra/tickets/issues/new
