On Thu, 2026-09-24 at 10:29 +0200, Clemens Lang via devel wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> > On 24. Sep 2026, at 09:24, Adam Williamson <[email protected]> 
> > wrote:
> > 
> > On Thu, 2026-09-24 at 03:43 +0000, Gary Buhrmaster wrote:
> > > On Thu, Sep 10, 2026 at 10:58 PM Miro Hrončok via devel
> > > <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > 
> > > >  Problem 5: installed package openssl-devel-engine-1:3.5.7-2.fc43.x86_64
> > > > requires openssl-devel(x86-64) = 1:3.5.7-2.fc43, but none of the 
> > > > providers can
> > > > be installed
> > > >   - openssl-devel-1:3.5.7-2.fc43.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade
> > > > repository
> > > >   - problem with installed package
> > > > 
> > > > Something needs to obsolete this. openssl-devel maybe?
> > > 
> > > openssl-devel-engine is now openssl3-devel-engine
> > > (which also depends on openssl3-devel). for the
> > > openssl3 compatibility rpms.
> > > 
> > > I am not entirely sure how that needs to be
> > > reflected in obsoletes and provides, but I
> > > presume some of the various rpm experts
> > > will know the correct incantations to make
> > > everything just work.
> > 
> > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=3096308 shows:
> > 
> > * Tue Sep 08 2026 Dmitry Belyavskiy <[email protected]> - 1:4.0.2-2
> > - Obsolete openssl-devel-engine explicitly
> >  Resolves: rhbz#2527847
> > 
> > but...it might actually have been better to have openssl3-devel-engine
> > obsolete and provide openssl-devel-engine, since it's possible people
> > who have it installed still want/need openssl 3 engine devel headers.
> 
> People who have openssl-devel-engine installed on F44 also have openssl-devel 
> installed. openssl-devel exists on F45, but conflicts with openssl3-devel.
> 
> Wouldn’t marking openssl3-devel-engine as providing and obsoleting 
> openssl-devel-engine just lead to an attempt to install both openssl-devel 
> and openssl3-devel-engine on F45, and therefore to a conflict?
> 
> NB: I made that point in 
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2527847#c1.

Ah yes indeed, that sounds right. Thanks for pointing it out.
-- 
Adam Williamson (he/him/his)
Fedora QA
Fedora Chat: @adamwill:fedora.im | Mastodon: @[email protected]
https://www.happyassassin.net



-- 
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://forge.fedoraproject.org/infra/tickets/issues/new

Reply via email to