On Fri, Sep 11, 2026 at 12:57:56AM +0200, Miro Hrončok via devel wrote: > This time I got 17 issues 😱 > > Problem 1: problem with installed package > - python3-bitstring-4.1.4-10.fc43.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade > repository > - nothing provides (python3.15dist(bitarray) < 3~~ with > python3.15dist(bitarray) >= 2.8) needed by > python3-bitstring-4.1.4-13.fc45.noarch from fedora > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2513926
I merged your PRs and submitted an update. It just needs karma now: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2026-bc0ec508a1 > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Problem 2: installed package cheese-2:44.1-10.fc43.x86_64 requires > libgnome-desktop-3.so.20()(64bit), but none of the providers can be > installed > - gnome-desktop3-44.5-1.fc43.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade > repository > - problem with installed package > > cheese was retired with "Archived upstream, obsoleted by Snapshot", but > nothing obsoletes that package. Should it be snapshot or > fedora-obsolete-packages? snapshot IMO. The package is owned by rust-sig, so I submitted an update that adds the Obsoletes. > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Problem 3: installed package cloudcompare-2.11.3-25.fc43.x86_64 requires > libgdal.so.37()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed > - gdal-libs-3.11.5-1.fc43.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository > - problem with installed package > > This was my package, now is retired, needs to be obsoleted by > fedora-obsolete-packages. Will do. > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Problem 4: installed package libgit2_1.8-1.8.5-1.fc43.x86_64 requires > libllhttp.so.9.3()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed > - llhttp-9.3.1-1.fc43.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository > - problem with installed package > > Something needs to obsolete this. Newer libgit2 maybe? @decathorpe, @sgallagh? > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Problem 5: installed package openssl-devel-engine-1:3.5.7-2.fc43.x86_64 > requires openssl-devel(x86-64) = 1:3.5.7-2.fc43, but none of the providers > can be installed > - openssl-devel-1:3.5.7-2.fc43.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade > repository > - problem with installed package > > Something needs to obsolete this. openssl-devel maybe? openssl-devel engine tried, but the Obsoletes didn't include the epoch. I reopened the bug and submitted two pull requests: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2527847#c10 > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Problem 6: installed package python3-brewkoji-1.36-1.fc43eng.noarch > requires python(abi) = 3.14, but none of the providers can be installed > - python3-3.14.7-1.fc43.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository > - problem with installed package > > This is internal Red Hat tooling, nothing Fedora can do. > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Problem 7: installed package rocm-libc++-19-14.rocm6.4.2.fc43.x86_64 > requires rocm-llvm-filesystem(x86-64) = 19-14.rocm6.4.2.fc43, but none of > the providers can be installed > - rocm-llvm-filesystem-19-14.rocm6.4.2.fc43.x86_64 does not belong to a > distupgrade repository > - problem with installed package > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2460027 > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2530870 > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Problem 8: installed package rubygem-jekyll-4.4.1-2.fc43.noarch requires > (rubygem(rouge) >= 3.0 with rubygem(rouge) < 5.0), but none of the providers > can be installed > - rubygem-rouge-4.6.0-1.fc43.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade > repository > - problem with installed package > > rubygem-jekyll was orphaned and retired and needs to be obsoleted by > fedora-obsolete-packages. https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/fedora-obsolete-packages/pull-request/145 https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/fedora-obsolete-packages/pull-request/126 > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Problem 11: package protobuf-compiler-33.5-7.fc45.x86_64 from fedora > conflicts with protobuf3-compiler provided by > protobuf3-compiler-3.19.6-66.fc45.x86_64 from fedora > - package grpc-cpp-1.48.4-65.fc45.x86_64 from fedora requires > libprotoc.so.30()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed > - problem with installed package > - problem with installed package > - protobuf-compiler-3.19.6-18.fc43.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade > repository > - grpc-cpp-1.48.4-54.fc43.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository > > Conflicting packages. No idea how to smooth the upgrade. Thoughts? The library and the binary should be split into separate packages. For both the stable and the compat versions of the package. This will make the libs coinstallable and also lighten the footprint of future installations. > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Problem 12: package python3-protobuf-6.33.5-4.fc45.x86_64 from fedora > conflicts with python3-protobuf < 4~~ provided by > python3-protobuf3-3.19.6-66.fc45.noarch from fedora > - package python3-googleapis-common-protos-1.63.0-16.fc45.noarch from > fedora requires ((python3.15dist(protobuf) < 3.20 or > python3.15dist(protobuf) > 3.20) with (python3.15dist(protobuf) < 3.20.1 or > python3.15dist(protobuf) > 3.20.1) with (python3.15dist(protobuf) < 4.21.1 > or python3.15dist(protobuf) > 4.21.1) with (python3.15dist(protobuf) < > 4.21.2 or python3.15dist(protobuf) > 4.21.2) with (python3.15dist(protobuf) > < 4.21.3 or python3.15dist(protobuf) > 4.21.3) with > (python3.15dist(protobuf) < 4.21.4 or python3.15dist(protobuf) > 4.21.4) > with (python3.15dist(protobuf) < 4.21.5 or python3.15dist(protobuf) > > 4.21.5) with python3.15dist(protobuf) < 6~~ with python3.15dist(protobuf) >= > 3.19.5), but none of the providers can be installed > - problem with installed package > - problem with installed package > - python3-protobuf-3.19.6-18.fc43.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade > repository > - python3-googleapis-common-protos-1.63.0-13.fc43.noarch does not belong > to a distupgrade repository This is bad. We should somehow make python3-protobuf3 coinstallable with python3-protobuf, probably by renaming the module. Unfortunately then the consumers would need to be update to use the new module version :( 'fedrq wr -S python3-protobuf3 | wc -l' says 30 packages would need to be updated. I think this _must_ be solved somehow, otherwise we'll have too many installation problems. > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > Problem 16: package rpmlint-2.9.0-3.fc45.noarch from fedora requires > python3.15dist(file-magic), but none of the providers can be installed > - package python3-file-magic-5.48-3.fc45.noarch from updates-testing > conflicts with python3-magic provided by python3-magic-0.4.27-18.fc45.noarch > from fedora > - package python3-file-magic-5.47-3.fc45.noarch from fedora conflicts with > python3-magic provided by python3-magic-0.4.27-18.fc45.noarch from fedora > - package diffoscope-325-2.fc45.x86_64 from fedora requires > python3.15dist(python-magic), but none of the providers can be installed > - problem with installed package > - problem with installed package > - rpmlint-2.8.0-2.fc43.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository > - diffoscope-306-1.fc43.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository > > Conflicting Python magics. Long term problem. > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1899279 > > Maybe revert > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/diffoscope/c/ef3db93c9f913d2ac899d6d78d4da73809b80cb9?branch=rawhide > if we can? > > I got an email about this months ago asking if we should patch rpmlint, but > I lost track, because it was an email and not a bugzilla. I'd rather not :( Arrgh. The revert was merged IIRC, is this solved now? Zbyszek -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://forge.fedoraproject.org/infra/tickets/issues/new
