On Tue, Feb 19, 2002 at 01:25:16PM -0500, Dan York wrote: > > > of unsupported contribs around that I might like to include even if Mitel > > doesn't support it (for example our own monitor system). Most of them play > > nice with ESGS once you know the little needed tricks. > > Sorry, *I* wasn't being clear. Our blades architecture allows for both > "Supported" blades where Mitel will provide support and "Unsupported" blades > where we will provide no direct support. Both can go through our delivery > mechanism.
But what about enabling 3rd party delivery servers? This would obviously either require you to provide a copy of your broker software, or as the blades protocol is found in the blades perl modules someone could implement their own. The logical extension would be to allow multiple sources, certainly has worked for eons with the likes of apt. Then you could ensure that Mitel provided blades had prominance at the top of the list, followed by say blades from Dan Brown's site or Darell May's site or perhaps a contrib.e-smith.com listing of active community additions to the product. Cheers -- Damien -- Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] (only) to discuss security issues Support for registered customers and partners to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives by mail and http://www.mail-archive.com/devinfo%40lists.e-smith.org
