On 16 May 2014 04:39, Andrej Mitrovic via Digitalmars-d-announce
<digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote:
> On 5/15/14, Manu via Digitalmars-d-announce
> <digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote:
>> You never mentioned that you were deterred by performance, I can go
>> and make it run at a thousand fps if you like :)
> Bah I feel terrible for even saying what I said. I tested it on a
> 9600GT (yeah it's old, but UT3 worked fine on it, so.. :) ).
> But I own a Radeon R7 250 now and it's running at a solid 60FPS, no
> framedrops at all. And it's actually displaying some graphics that
> weren't there before. I think I may just have had some buggy drivers
> on my old GPU. It's running beautifully, playing the Bohemian
> Rhapsody.
> So, apologies for that rant. Maybe I'll add some silly graphics in a
> pull request and you won't say nobody contributed! Stay tuned. :)

Okay... well, I'm sure it does perform terrible anyway, I've done
literally no work on rendering. It's just hacky 2 minute throw-away
rendering code to display something on the screen.

Out of curiosity, are you running Linux or Windows? I barely test the
linux build (I just got it to work), so I can't really comment on it's
performance. If a linux user would like to hit it with a profiler and
see if I've done anything stupid in the linux code, that'd be useful.
The linux build also needs better input and midi code to be properly

Reply via email to