On Wednesday, 4 May 2016 at 12:42:30 UTC, jmh530 wrote:
On Wednesday, 4 May 2016 at 02:50:08 UTC, Jeremy DeHaan wrote:
I'm not sure, but one would think that @safe code wouldn't
need any extra information about the union. I wouldn't know
how to differentiate between them though during runtime.
Probably someone with more experience with the compiler would
know more about that kind of thing.
You can identify safe functions with
All I meant was that I don't know enough about what the compiler
does with built in types to make this work. It almost sounds like
we would need a safe union and unsafe union type and do some
extra stuff for the unsafe union, but I'm just starting to learn
about this stuff.