On Mon, 12 Nov 2001, Charles Daminato wrote: > The notice was held back until today, hence the corrections not showing > up.
huh? Some of them showed up way earlier... Like the weblords.com domain I alerted you guys about on oct 11th, and mindportal.net on oct 13th... OSRS ticket: (#6932-000028-4686\284686) speaking of which, those domains aren't on the lists you guys just sent us! Their absense scares the daylights out of me... what else has been renewed in the meantime and isn't showing up? It is one thing to _go_ to the customers and say verisign messed up, but it is even harder to _respond_ to a customers "wtf happened to my (recent) renewal" with finger pointing. further, at least two of these corrections showed up october 19th (lasercuttingco.com, fernite.com ) Hhmm, now that I think about it, you guys aren't offering any renewals at cost which would be the obvious way to soften the blow, the resellers and/or the end users are taking the bitter pill, and both opensrs and netsol registrar are making a profit on it :-( I've heard jefftovic (easydns) say that they are eating a number of the renewals, I know we already have and probably will eat at least another dozen. Wouldn't at-cost-renewals be the simplest thing for OpenSRS to do? Or is this another case of 'not really' trusting the RSPs. Sorry, I'm not intending to come off as the bitchy RSP from hell, but things don't jive here, and you guys have had a month to come up with a good solution. (Which implies that someone must have thought of the at-cost idea and it got voted down :-[). -Tom > > Charles Daminato > TUCOWS Product Manager > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > On Mon, 12 Nov 2001, Tom Brown wrote: > > > > > Isn't this in direct conflict with "domain being in arrears" being one of > > the few 'officially valid' reasons for declining a transfer? (Not that I > > expect any disagreement.) > > > > Sure makes one hate big companies. There are a lot of scummy small > > businesses, but ... > > > > While I'm venting, Chuck, how come some of these 'October 21st' > > corrections didn't show up until today? Or is that why the notice was held > > back till today? (even at 4AM your time achieve.net was showing a 2002 > > expiry [which is now correct since we renewed it.] in the RWI) > > > > Bill, do you mind being quoted? > > > > On Mon, 12 Nov 2001, Charles Daminato wrote: > > > > > RRP business rules - if a domain is transfered within the 45 days past > > > expiry, the registry will refund the losing registrar the fee initially > > > imposed for the auto-renewal (which occurs at day 0) > > > > > > Charles Daminato > > > TUCOWS Product Manager > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > On Mon, 12 Nov 2001, David Harris wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > 5) The registry credits a year back to Netsol Registrar (because of the 45 > > > > > day rule), however Verisign Registrar DOES NOT refund the renewal fee paid > > > > > by the registrant. Here the bug comes into play... the year was not > > > > > actually removed. > > > > > > > > What is this 45 day rule? Where is it stated? > > > > > > > > I've never heard of the registry giving a registrar a refund for a renewal. > > > > > > > > David > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Courage is doing what you're afraid to do. > > http://BareMetal.com/ | There can be no courage unless you're scared. > > | - Eddie Rickenbacker > > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Courage is doing what you're afraid to do. http://BareMetal.com/ | There can be no courage unless you're scared. | - Eddie Rickenbacker
