Isn't this in direct conflict with "domain being in arrears" being one of the few 'officially valid' reasons for declining a transfer? (Not that I expect any disagreement.)
Sure makes one hate big companies. There are a lot of scummy small businesses, but ... While I'm venting, Chuck, how come some of these 'October 21st' corrections didn't show up until today? Or is that why the notice was held back till today? (even at 4AM your time achieve.net was showing a 2002 expiry [which is now correct since we renewed it.] in the RWI) Bill, do you mind being quoted? On Mon, 12 Nov 2001, Charles Daminato wrote: > RRP business rules - if a domain is transfered within the 45 days past > expiry, the registry will refund the losing registrar the fee initially > imposed for the auto-renewal (which occurs at day 0) > > Charles Daminato > TUCOWS Product Manager > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > On Mon, 12 Nov 2001, David Harris wrote: > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > 5) The registry credits a year back to Netsol Registrar (because of the 45 > > > day rule), however Verisign Registrar DOES NOT refund the renewal fee paid > > > by the registrant. Here the bug comes into play... the year was not > > > actually removed. > > > > What is this 45 day rule? Where is it stated? > > > > I've never heard of the registry giving a registrar a refund for a renewal. > > > > David > > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Courage is doing what you're afraid to do. http://BareMetal.com/ | There can be no courage unless you're scared. | - Eddie Rickenbacker
