Mark Jeftovic wrote: > > Bringing the prospect of invalid email addresses into it opens another > line of debate. Sure, the CIRA process is much more onerous, but the > end result is you are left with a much higher incidence of *valid* email > addresses on file in the admin contact slot.
Yes, and valid e-mail addresses are very useful for only two purposes: 1. modifying the domain 2. spamming If the tech contact can take care of (1), who cares about whether the e-mail is valid or not? > What about the probably 2 or 3 million domains worldnic registered > with that [EMAIL PROTECTED] nonsense in all three contacts? > Tell me that is better than CIRA. It isn't, its an outright travesty > and one that can't occur under the CIRA system. No, it's about on-par. Actually, it could happen, but would take some work. 1. register domain with valid e-mail 2. send registry modify request with invalid e-mail 3. confirm modification. > I do agree with your point about tech contacts, it would be good to > allow those to if not modify admin contacts then at least confirm > an ECAC request. Or for that matter the ctc_second_email field, > which as far as I can tell is completely unused under any circumstance. ECAC is ??? If you want to use the ctc_second_email field, I would suggest having that prefilled with the tech contact... -kb -- Kris Benson ABC Communications +1 (250)612-5270 x204 +1 (888)235-1174 x204
