Forgive me if I'm misinterpreting here...

I think Robert may be focusing on good design done w/o the use of
personas, which I completely agree is possible and very probable.

But that doesn't mean that *no* user centered research was conducted -
it just means they didn't use personas. Which I think is Todd's point
here...good design is much more probable when some sort of user
centered research (especially when designing for an audience other
than yourself) is conducted.

I'm a big proponent of UCD - I believe "good design" is much more
probable when UCD is utilized. That said, it doesn't guarantee good UX
and it doesn't mean you'll never have a good UX unless you do formal
research.

It would be very interesting to get a rough idea of how many "good"
products out there were developed strictly in a vaccuum by marketing,
designers or engineers - w/o the use of customer interviews,
observation, ethnography, usability testing, personas, card sorting,
task analysis etc.

Jeff

On Nov 27, 2007 2:02 PM, Robert Hoekman, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> >
> >
> > Can good design be done w/o formal research? Well, yes of course, but it's
> rare.
>
> Are you sure?
>
> I mean, I agree that there are a huge number of lousy products/sites/etc out
> there, but there are also boatloads of great products, and according to
> Jared, only something like 5% of teams who use personas are doing them
> right, and I'd guess that only a small percentage of design teams use them
> at all.
>
> Assuming this is a correct statement, I doubt that the only good products
> out there are those designed by this measly 5% of the already small
> percentage of persona-using designers. So where are the rest of the good
> products coming from?
>
> Good design happens. Process can help, research can help - heck, even
> personas can help. But none are a requirement of good design. And since each
> is used effectively so rarely, it's obvious that a ton of good design is
> done without these tools.
>
> So, how confident are you, really, that good design is rare unless backed up
> by formal research?
>
> (Sorry if I'm sounding needlessly antagonistic, but this subject really gets
> under my skin, as you might already be aware.)
>
> -r-
________________________________________________________________
*Come to IxDA Interaction08 | Savannah*
February 8-10, 2008 in Savannah, GA, USA
Register today: http://interaction08.ixda.org/

________________________________________________________________
Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)!
To post to this list ....... [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe ................ http://www.ixda.org/unsubscribe
List Guidelines ............ http://www.ixda.org/guidelines
List Help .................. http://www.ixda.org/help

Reply via email to