So if we can agree that the intent is to restrict the policy to concerning LOPSA events / professional situations, what should the wording be?
Also, I think employers are allowed to discriminate based on illicit drugs, since they can be a fireable offense? Anyone know for sure (or is friendly with an HR department that knows?) --Matt On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 10:46 AM, Elijah Wright <[email protected]>wrote: > On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 9:39 AM, Bill Pechter <[email protected]> wrote: > > > What's it mean in clear English. Can someone tell me what the underlined > > means...? > > > > or the use or nonuse of > > lawful products away from a professional setting is expressly prohibited > > under this policy. > > > The "lawful products" thing throws me for a loop too. Does that mean > you can't discriminate against me for drinking Coors Light, but can > discriminate against me if I have a heroin problem? > > Weird. And at some point I suspect the literal words and the intent > begin to diverge... > _______________________________________________ > Discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss > This list provided by the League of Professional System Administrators > http://lopsa.org/ > -- LITTLE GIRL: But which cookie will you eat FIRST? COOKIE MONSTER: Me think you have misconception of cookie-eating process.
_______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss This list provided by the League of Professional System Administrators http://lopsa.org/
