Do you mean like in plausible deniability aspect like TrueCrypt's? Or the type where typing in a special password will wipe the volume?
If anyone's serious about searching your hardware, are they really going to let you enter a password? I guess this is more useful in avoiding casual harassment at the border. Which US citizens are apparently now free from, but the rest of us must endure :) On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 4:36 PM, Matt Lawrence <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, 15 Mar 2013, John BORIS wrote: > > Lawrence, >> I think it was appropriate for the list. Albeit maybe ,missing some >> things or long winded but you as a Moderator can't get into editing a >> person's post. I think you made the right decision. >> > > I agree that it was appropriate, which has caused me to think of another > issue: When are commercial security systems going to accept a "duress" > password. We are getting to the point that we really need this capability. > > -- Matt > It's not what I know that counts. > It's what I can remember in time to use. > > ______________________________**_________________ > Discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.lopsa.org/cgi-**bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss<https://lists.lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss> > This list provided by the League of Professional System Administrators > http://lopsa.org/ >
_______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss This list provided by the League of Professional System Administrators http://lopsa.org/
