ah, I should clarify. I think that it should be a given in the
sense that anyone should expect nondestructive editing in modern
packages, and pretty much assume that it exists.
Anyway, I'm surprised as I said, that they would assume otherwise.
Smiles,
Cara :)
On Sep 21, 2008, at 6:14 PM, Cara Quinn wrote:
wow, I'm surprised! That really should be a given, with the
sophistication of not only aperture, but most, if not all, modern
photography Suites.
Do you have limited sight, or are you using this package without it?…
Are you using VO with it?
Smiles,
Cara :)
On Sep 21, 2008, at 5:16 PM, John Denning wrote:
Cara -- My question on Aperture was. "I know working with raw
format files is non destructive. How about JPEG? Does it make a
copy or what?" Answer, "oh no it's destructive, can't go back."
WRONG!!!
She didn't even pause to think about it.
On Sep 21, 2008, at 4:34 PM, Cara Quinn wrote:
<smile> Out of curiosity, what was your Aperture question?…
anyway, I also think a perfectly acceptable answer for a
salesperson to give is 'I don't know, let me go see if I can look
that up for you; be back in a minute…'
---
View my Online Portfolio at:
http://www.onemodelplace.com/CaraQuinn
---
View my Online Portfolio at:
http://www.onemodelplace.com/CaraQuinn
