My concern is scope creep.

On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 1:15 PM, Omar Rassi <[email protected]> wrote:

> I'm not trying brush anything under a rug, its all open right here. And
> you're right about giving everyone a chance to say something, so far this
> thread has been up for two days and only a few individuals have been
> discussing the issue, with only one against taking down the wall. When I
> started the thread I myself wanted to keep the room, but have since changed
> my mind after reading what Andrew L and Torrie said about it. So far only
> one person in the thread still wants to keep it and has not yet provided a
> response to the key points outlined or answered the questions on his
> argument.
>
> If you have something to say on the subject for or against taking down the
> walls of that room, please do. Please do not limit yourself to one evening
> of short discussion on an important topic, especially when a wide range of
> other information must also be discussed during the same meeting.
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 12:36 PM, Justin Herman <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Well said Devin.
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 12:29 PM, [email protected] <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Omar, the decision is split. This is a discussion for the next meeting.
>>> I am against tearing out the storage closet and the wall it resides in.
>>> That being said I am not against removing the "window" from the other,
>>> south facing, wall. Stop trying to push decisions through by calling it
>>> Synhak philosophy and brushing it under the rug. If we have disagreements
>>> we need to give everyone a chance to speak their piece. See you at the next
>>> meeting,
>>>
>>> Devin Wolfe.
>>>
>>> Sent from Yahoo Mail on 
>>> Android<http://overview.mail.yahoo.com/mobile/?.src=Android>
>>>
>>>  ------------------------------
>>> * From: * Omar Rassi <[email protected]>;
>>> * To: * SYN/HAK discussion list <[email protected]>;
>>> * Subject: * Re: [SH-Discuss] 48 Summit St front room discussion thread
>>> * Sent: * Mon, Jan 20, 2014 4:40:18 PM
>>>
>>>   Andrew L, I agree, we all love Synhak and want the best for our new
>>> space but we must refrain from passionate sarcasm and profanity during
>>> discussion, its not acceptable during meetings nor should it be during
>>> discussion. From this thread, there is a very strong and compelling
>>> argument from more than one person for bringing down the walls in the front
>>> room, turning one wall into a welcome bar.
>>>
>>> Currently, having a walled off restricted area is not in keeping with
>>> Synhak's philosophy. The admin computer I had set up before plus our
>>> document github should be more than sufficient sufficient to store and
>>> maintain any documentation or office related work that needs done by an
>>> officer in the event an officer doesn't have access to their own computer
>>> to do it with. When Synhak grows large enough to warrant a dedicated office
>>> space, then we'll revisit the subject.
>>>
>>> My mind's eye is seeing the area becoming a place to make it easy to
>>> find to more information on Synhak, access to membership and liability
>>> forms, showcase sample projects (like the hard drive speakers Dialbot,
>>> etc). like the the kiosk that was at 21 W. North but version 2.0.
>>> essentially an excellent first sight for new visitors and guests of Synhak.
>>>
>>> For now, lets get the area ready for that by taking down the wall,
>>> making the bar height section of the other wall, and continue the
>>> renovations and repair that must take place anyway regardless of what
>>> happens to the wall.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 8:30 AM, a l <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Firstly I realize people are passionate about the space and making it
>>>> better but if we could leave dismissive, explicit, and excessively
>>>> sarcastic commentary out of the discussion that would be excellent to
>>>> everyone.
>>>>
>>>> Secondly the arguments against tearing down the office we already have
>>>> to build a slightly different one in the exact same place are more than
>>>> just "There are other things in need of doing!". Secondly as you pointed
>>>> out tearing down walls is not expensive. Remodeling the now larger space so
>>>> it doesn't look like people ran drunkenly around with sawz-alls and
>>>> crowbars is the expensive part. We have to get: ceiling tile, drywall,
>>>> paint, relocate more outlets(new wiring, boxes, &c), and floor vents for
>>>> formerly wall vents.
>>>> We are losing money and working on a finite time table. Having a
>>>> prioritized list actually does mean we should focus the vast majority of
>>>> our limited time and money on them. They are the projects that need to get
>>>> done in order for SynHak to function come opening day. Getting the main
>>>> workspace up and running should be everyone's main effort. After that's
>>>> done we can and should focus on the 'nice to have' list.
>>>>
>>>> regards,
>>>> Andrew L
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 1:01 AM, Andrew Buczko <
>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I shouldn't have to explain this...
>>>>>
>>>>> Every time you start a project you run into expenses. Yes we can
>>>>> recycle what materials we have but there's always something else needed to
>>>>> get the project done.
>>>>>
>>>>> Personally, I'm done with this, so & so already started tearing out
>>>>> the wall, so fuck it! lets just gut the whole fucking place!
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>  On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 11:29 AM, Omar Rassi <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Andy, I also emailed the start of this thread to [email protected],
>>>>>> discuss is what responded first.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> A few questions for you Andy:
>>>>>> >It's a nice little room, we can use for what ever we want, if you
>>>>>> take it away then all we'll have is big empty space.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It won't be empty, it would be built into the welcome bar. The whole
>>>>>> reason we moved to 48 Summit is because we need more space, are you 
>>>>>> saying
>>>>>> we now have too much? How does keeping the walls make it less empty?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> >we don't have the money to build new walls.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Why would we need to build new walls there? Why would a Synhak
>>>>>> office absolutely require walls? If a separate office is needed, a
>>>>>> walled off area right by the front door is not a good place to have one, 
>>>>>> so
>>>>>> a room to our specifications would need to be constructed anyway but in a
>>>>>> different place at the space as a long term project
>>>>>>
>>>>>> >heck we still have to fix the ceiling first. Plus if you take out
>>>>>> the wall you then have to fix the ceiling, who wants to look at a bunch 
>>>>>> of
>>>>>> gaps?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That's a good point. Was this part of the ceiling not included in our
>>>>>> estimates regarding roof repair? What is required to fix it, how much 
>>>>>> wood?
>>>>>> how much in ceiling tile? Can we get a hardware store to donate the
>>>>>> materials for a donation tax receipt?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Andrew, you're right remodeling is expensive, we still have plenty of
>>>>>> wood at our disposal and we've reclaimed even more from both 21 W North 
>>>>>> and
>>>>>> 48 Summit. what do we think are the expenses associated with turning the
>>>>>> room into a welcome area/paperwork repository? And what materials and
>>>>>> expertise do we already have on hand to make it happen? I can think of
>>>>>> floor tileand ceiling repair though I have very little experience with
>>>>>> carpentry and building repair so I couldn't begin to guess how much work
>>>>>> and material would be needed.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thank you for sharing.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 10:24 AM, a l <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I thunk it would be nice if that area were a reception type desk
>>>>>>> welcome bar type structure that housed paper work. As far as walks are
>>>>>>> concerned i think half height walls would be nice as this allows people 
>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>> see the whole space but still restricts access to documents. locked 
>>>>>>> drawers
>>>>>>> they are only open during filing keeps privacy concerns satisfied but 
>>>>>>> still
>>>>>>> allows for any member to get blank forms for visitors.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> That said remodeling is expensive, we have other more pressing
>>>>>>> expenses like getting up to code properly installed outlets in the main
>>>>>>> shop so people can hack. I think we need to prioritize our spending and
>>>>>>> realize we can't do it all at the same time. For me removing existing
>>>>>>> infrastructure only to modify it slightly is a frivolous expense we 
>>>>>>> can't
>>>>>>> shots right now. We should save for and do it this year, in the next six
>>>>>>> months money permitting.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Also every project we start now is one more we have to finish by
>>>>>>> opening day. And we already have quite a list.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> regards,
>>>>>>> Andrew L
>>>>>>> On Jan 19, 2014 1:12 AM, "Torrie Fischer" <[email protected]>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Sunday, January 19, 2014 00:33:16 Omar Rassi wrote:
>>>>>>>> > >1) Are we keeping the room or are we taking down the wall with
>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> > closet/shelves?
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> > Torrie's argument is compelling, though I leaned towards keeping
>>>>>>>> the room
>>>>>>>> > as is, I am now indifferent to walls up or down.
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> > >2) If we are keeping the room, for what purpose will it fulfill?
>>>>>>>> Crafts?
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> > Admin office/recordkeeping? servers? Member storage? Computer
>>>>>>>> lab? Lounge?
>>>>>>>> > Etc etc.
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> > I had envisioned a place where Synhak Inc. office could go. A
>>>>>>>> place where
>>>>>>>> > the office of secretary, treasurer, and the champions, could work
>>>>>>>> on the
>>>>>>>> > not so exciting parts of running a non-profit with minimal
>>>>>>>> distraction from
>>>>>>>> > hackers hacking. It would be a room to keep important paper
>>>>>>>> records that we
>>>>>>>> > are required to have on file in a controlled place to prevent
>>>>>>>> tampering
>>>>>>>> > (we've never had an issue with this in the past, its just a
>>>>>>>> perspective of
>>>>>>>> > assurance from a 3rd party perspective i.e. How can we guarantee
>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>> > records are true if anyone can walk in and change the paper
>>>>>>>> documents when
>>>>>>>> > a member's back is turned?)
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> > >3) Do we even need walls for those purposes? In other words, if
>>>>>>>> it does
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> > come down, will that detract from anyone's desires for how to use
>>>>>>>> the space?
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> > A bolted and locked file cabinet and appropriate file permissions
>>>>>>>> > (read-write access for officers and champions, read-only access
>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>> > everyone else) placed on a workstation designated for office use
>>>>>>>> can
>>>>>>>> > accomplish the same records assurance mentioned above while
>>>>>>>> keeping the
>>>>>>>> > digital copies open and transparent. So perhaps a walled off area
>>>>>>>> may not
>>>>>>>> > be necessary as I previously thought. Objectively thinking about
>>>>>>>> it,
>>>>>>>> > creating a welcome area out of that room would not lessen my
>>>>>>>> desire to use
>>>>>>>> > the space and could provide a wow factor for visitors and guests,
>>>>>>>> I can
>>>>>>>> > think of alternatives to achieve my desired goals for a Synhak
>>>>>>>> Inc. Office.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thank you. It is important that we all try to be as pragmatic as
>>>>>>>> possible when
>>>>>>>> considering how to best allocate the finite volume we have
>>>>>>>> available to us. I
>>>>>>>> feel the quantity of shared space should be maximized as it gives
>>>>>>>> others the
>>>>>>>> broadest canvas that this building can provide, until it becomes
>>>>>>>> more
>>>>>>>> beneficial to the community to do otherwise.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> > On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 11:24 PM, Torrie Fischer
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> > <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>>>>>> > > On Saturday, January 18, 2014 22:26:49 Omar Rassi wrote:
>>>>>>>> > > > There may be some miscommunication/misunderstanding about the
>>>>>>>> front room
>>>>>>>> > >
>>>>>>>> > > at
>>>>>>>> > >
>>>>>>>> > > > 48 Summit St. So lets talk about what to do with that room.
>>>>>>>> > > >
>>>>>>>> > > > The original plan was to remove all the walls, shelving and
>>>>>>>> cabinetry to
>>>>>>>> > > > give us a large open area to do what we wish with and turn
>>>>>>>> one of its
>>>>>>>> > >
>>>>>>>> > > walls
>>>>>>>> > >
>>>>>>>> > > > into a welcome bar like at the old space. However, it appears
>>>>>>>> that some
>>>>>>>> > > > members want to keep the small office-ish type room for
>>>>>>>> various reasons
>>>>>>>> > > > (each person in favor of keeping the room has a different
>>>>>>>> idea). So lets
>>>>>>>> > > > discuss!
>>>>>>>> > > >
>>>>>>>> > > > Key points of discussion:
>>>>>>>> > > >
>>>>>>>> > > > 1) Are we keeping the room or are we taking down the wall
>>>>>>>> with the
>>>>>>>> > > > closet/shelves?
>>>>>>>> > >
>>>>>>>> > > I would prefer to remove the closet side wall of that room and
>>>>>>>> create a
>>>>>>>> > > new
>>>>>>>> > > welcome bar from the other wall of the room by cutting it to
>>>>>>>> only a few
>>>>>>>> > > feet
>>>>>>>> > > tall. This would create a very open and inviting physical space.
>>>>>>>> > >
>>>>>>>> > > > 2) If we are keeping the room, for what purpose will it
>>>>>>>> fulfill? Crafts?
>>>>>>>> > > > Admin office/recordkeeping? servers? Member storage? Computer
>>>>>>>> lab?
>>>>>>>> > >
>>>>>>>> > > Lounge?
>>>>>>>> > >
>>>>>>>> > > > Etc etc.
>>>>>>>> > >
>>>>>>>> > > If someone is intending on turning it into some form of member
>>>>>>>> storage,
>>>>>>>> > > SYNHAK, Inc office, or server closet, I think it would be wise
>>>>>>>> to remember
>>>>>>>> > > that we have a massive basement that has not yet been spoken
>>>>>>>> for in any
>>>>>>>> > > significant capacity and will likely see the smallest fraction
>>>>>>>> of actual
>>>>>>>> > > foot
>>>>>>>> > > traffic in proportion to the floor space.
>>>>>>>> > >
>>>>>>>> > > Additionally, why would you want something so obviously meant
>>>>>>>> to be hidden
>>>>>>>> > > and
>>>>>>>> > > out of the way *immediately next to the front door*? Thats just
>>>>>>>> not good
>>>>>>>> > > feng
>>>>>>>> > > shui.
>>>>>>>> > >
>>>>>>>> > > > 3) Do we even need walls for those purposes? In other words,
>>>>>>>> if it does
>>>>>>>> > > > come down, will that detract from anyone's desires for how to
>>>>>>>> use the
>>>>>>>> > >
>>>>>>>> > > space?
>>>>>>>> > >
>>>>>>>> > > I feel it creates a walled off area of a space that is
>>>>>>>> otherwise open to
>>>>>>>> > > everyone. It implies that there is some private part of the
>>>>>>>> space that
>>>>>>>> > > you're
>>>>>>>> > > not allowed to visit, and it is immediately at the front
>>>>>>>> entrance. The
>>>>>>>> > > building already has enough cubicle-dungeon-like attributes
>>>>>>>> without
>>>>>>>> > > functional
>>>>>>>> > > windows up front.
>>>>>>>> > >
>>>>>>>> > > > For reference please see the floorplan of 48 Summit St. at
>>>>>>>> > > > http://calculais.com/syn/syncalled.pdf and Synhak's google
>>>>>>>> plus page at
>>>>>>>> > > > https://plus.google.com/104182820750454997283 for pictures
>>>>>>>> of 48 Summit
>>>>>>>> > >
>>>>>>>> > > St
>>>>>>>> > >
>>>>>>>> > > > pre-renovation. The bottom of the floorplan page is where the
>>>>>>>> entrance
>>>>>>>> > > > is
>>>>>>>> > > > (Front door is angled) the room in question is directly to
>>>>>>>> the right of
>>>>>>>> > > > that, the specific wall to come down is to the right of the
>>>>>>>> room's door
>>>>>>>> > > > with the wall closest to the front door being turned into a
>>>>>>>> welcome bar
>>>>>>>> > >
>>>>>>>> > > as
>>>>>>>> > >
>>>>>>>> > > > with the old space. Remember that this is simply discussion
>>>>>>>> where
>>>>>>>> > >
>>>>>>>> > > everyone
>>>>>>>> > >
>>>>>>>> > > > can voice their concerns. Ultimately this should be decided
>>>>>>>> no later
>>>>>>>> > > > than
>>>>>>>> > > > Tuesday's meeting by the membership as per our
>>>>>>>> self-governance process (
>>>>>>>> > > > https://synhak.org/wiki/Governance) so we can get a move on
>>>>>>>> with this
>>>>>>>> > >
>>>>>>>> > > area
>>>>>>>> > >
>>>>>>>> > > > and once decided put it behind us.
>>>>>>>> > >
>>>>>>>> > > _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> > > Discuss mailing list
>>>>>>>> > > [email protected]
>>>>>>>> > > https://synhak.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> Discuss mailing list
>>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>> https://synhak.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> Discuss mailing list
>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>> https://synhak.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Discuss mailing list
>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>> https://synhak.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Discuss mailing list
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> https://synhak.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Discuss mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> https://synhak.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Discuss mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://synhak.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Discuss mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://synhak.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://synhak.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>
_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://synhak.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

Reply via email to