On 12/10/2020 4:46 PM, Kurt Andersen (b) wrote:
to quibble with the "*unauthorized use*" situation. This situation
devolves into use-as-imagined vs. use-as-really-used when one
considers various intermediary scenarios.
(to respond to the content...)
So, the driving issue is that it's characterizing problematic usage; use
that did not achieve a DMARC pass.
And, yeah, that doesn't mean the use was unauthorized, given the other
possible explanations for failure.
So, without suggesting a label, I'd describe this factor as "how serious
is a failure to get a DMARC pass"? If that's the right semantic, what's
a reasonable label to use? If it's not the right semantic, what is?
d/
--
Dave Crocker
dcroc...@gmail.com
408.329.0791
Volunteer, Silicon Valley Chapter
American Red Cross
dave.crock...@redcross.org
_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
dmarc@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
