At 02:31 PM 11/26/2008, you wrote: >Does anyone actually have a patent number on this? > >I was previously told (and I'm sorry I don't have the source, that's >why I'm asking now) that the AMBE codec was NOT patented, but was >protected by Trade Secret law. If that is the case than it's >entirely different and _could_ be clean reverse engineered legally, >in theory. In practice it may simply be too complex to accomplish.
Interesting, though I do imagine that if this were true, reverse engineering would be a complex undertaking. 73 de VK3JED http://vkradio.com
