I suppose WMUK's learning environment is not something other language editions can profit from, right?
I still strongly prefer the Wikipedia:Training toolkit. best regards Vojtěch Dostál místopředseda / vice-chairman Wikimedia Česká republika / Wikimedia Czech Republic http://www.wikimedia.cz Facebook <https://www.facebook.com/Wikimedia.CR> | Twitter <https://twitter.com/Wikimedia_CR> | Newsletter <http://eepurl.com/FsHJr> 2015-02-23 12:06 GMT+01:00 Charles Matthews <[email protected] >: > > On 23 February 2015 at 10:15, Vojtěch Dostál <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> In my opinion, VE will gradually replace the old editor and the new wave >> of editors will learn to edit using VE, not the old Wiki markup system. It >> won't just be a copyediting or "small edit" tool. >> > > I think the reality of WYSIWYG systems is that they will always frustrate > advanced users. I don't think a time will come when the only wikitext > editors are bots. And, after all, looking at the wikitext of how something > is done is one good way to learn it. > > > Ideally, could any of the interested parties state that they intend to >> write a VisualEditor training (in English) of some sort? Same as Pine, we >> do not want to wait ages for it - a two months time seems like a reasonable >> period that we could wait for. If not, we will write it, and hopefully do >> some translations of our texts into English if you are interested. >> > > It is the sort of thing I would do for the WMUK Virtual Learning > Environment, as contract work, since there is a clear lead. But I don't > know if they would fund it. > > Charles > > _______________________________________________ > Education mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/education > >
_______________________________________________ Education mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/education
