--- Benoit Nadeau <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Bonjour de Montreal,
> 
> In another life, I was working for a EMC Test lab
> and we always used the
> step by step procedure which was in the ESD
> Standard. We tested using this
> procedure for years and we did encounter some
> products who failed at low
> level ESD but had no problem at higher levels.
> 
> We wondered what to conclude and had some
> hypothesis.
> 
> 1) may be the current path was different at higher
> level or
> 2) Lower levels might have a slightly longer rise
> time which tends to produce 
> more energy in the lower part of the frequency
> spectrum where the EUT was
> more sensible.
>


Partly true. The risetime changes as the voltage increases. The
risetime "slows" (dV/dt or dI/dt value gets reduced) down as you begin
to go over 6-8kV. I also have seen products fail at 2-4 kV and pass at
levels 8-10 kV. This ofcourse is on air discharge equipment where
variability of the risetime is expected.
Contact discharge equipment do not exhibit much risetime variability
(at least not to a large degree)

Hans T. Mellberg
EMC/ESD Consultant
member ANSI/IEEE C63.16 WG on ESD
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Bid and sell for free at http://auctions.yahoo.com


---------
This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list.
To cancel your subscription, send mail to [email protected]
with the single line: "unsubscribe emc-pstc" (without the
quotes).  For help, send mail to [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], or
[email protected] (the list administrators).

Reply via email to