On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 7:22 AM, Charles Steinkuehler <
char...@steinkuehler.net> wrote:

> The PRU can do a great job with step/dir generation.  Anything that
> has encoders should really be running with FPGA hardware and something
> like the Mesa boards.
>

Why do you  say so? PRU is running at 200MHz and can read and write GPIO
every 5ns. I think that's close to what the FPGA is capable of. Of course
FPGA can then process these in  parallel using independent hardware units,
but still.


> I was just trying to point out that ARM parts and boards are available
> that more directly compete with the "traditional" Atom motherboards
> currently popular here (including conventional PCI/PCIe expansion slots!).
>

As far as I can see, PCI/PCIe is the only differentiating factor, unless
you imply that Atom-class means better quality, or better noise immunity
etc. Low power should not be a big deal---after all, LinuxCNC is likely to
drive electric motors rated in kiloWatts.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Introducing AppDynamics Lite, a free troubleshooting tool for Java/.NET
Get 100% visibility into your production application - at no cost.
Code-level diagnostics for performance bottlenecks with <2% overhead
Download for free and get started troubleshooting in minutes.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_ap1
_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Reply via email to