Yyou may not have seen this:

Macworld: Mac 911: Stop Entourage background churning
<http://www.macworld.com/weblogs/mac911/2007/02/entouragechurning/index.php?
lsrc=mwrss>

Could it be related?

-- Joshua



On 2/22/07 5:36 PM, "George" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Hello, List -- On 02/23/07 1:31 AM, Brian Little (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
> wrote:
> 
>> In the Console under /var/log/windowserver.log
>> 
>> Right about the same time as the hang. Glad to see I'm not the only one.
> 
> I did see the exact same as you (as follows), and the time probably does
> coincide with the one freeze I experienced yesterday (although if it was
> really a 7 min. freeze, it was the longest yet):
> 
> Feb 22 09:51:23  [61] kCGErrorFailure: CGXDisableUpdate: UI updates were
> forcibly disabled by application "Entourage" for over 1 second.
> Server has re-enabled them.
> Feb 22 09:57:34  [61] kCGErrorFailure: CGXDisableUpdate: UI updates were
> forcibly disabled by application "Entourage" for over 1 second.
> Server has re-enabled them.
> 
> However, just prior to the above, the log also shows the following:
> 
> Feb 22 09:50:54  [61] kCGErrorFailure: CGXDisableUpdate: UI updates were
> forcibly disabled by application "Office Notifications" for over 1 second.
> Server has re-enabled them.
> Feb 22 09:50:58  [61] kCGErrorFailure: CGXDisableUpdate: UI updates were
> forcibly disabled by application "Office Notifications" for over 1 second.
> Server has re-enabled them.
> Feb 22 09:51:06  [61] kCGErrorFailure: CGXDisableUpdate: UI updates were
> forcibly disabled by application "Office Notifications" for over 1 second.
> Server has re-enabled them.
> 
> So, maybe Office Notifications has something to do with this Freezing
> problem in Entourage?? Hopefully, based on your input yesterday, together
> with the above, it will shed some light on this for the MBU and other
> experts here and someone will be able to finally identify the cause and come
> up with a fix. Thanks I advance to anyone who finally solves this Entourage
> freezing mystery.
> 
> Cheers,
> George
> 

Reply via email to