As long as you don't mind the sheer bulk of the lense, and attention that
it draws, I'd say you can't go wrong... I have the f4 and if weight is a
factor it is a great choice with performance similar to that of the 2.8
(except for the 2.8 part) - The bottom line for me, was that realistically
the f4 would make it many more places with me than the 2.8, but the 2.8
sure would be nice when I slap that 2x on...
>My 50-200/3.5-4.5L has died. I'm now choosing between the 70-200 2.8 or the
>4.0. Has anyone regretted buying the 2.8 lens? Too big? Optically not what
>you expected wide open? Do you leave it home more than you thought you
>would because of the weight? Do faster/more pushable films make you feel as
>though you don't need the 2.8 now? Or any other reason?
John Pattenden
MacSourcery
Visit Blinky and pick up a crispy treat..
http://www.macscreensavers.com
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
