John Pattenden writes:
> As long as you don't mind the sheer bulk of the lense, and attention that
> it draws, I'd say you can't go wrong... I have the f4 and if weight is a
> factor it is a great choice with performance similar to that of the 2.8
What about the Sigma one then (the 70-200mm f/2.8 EX APO HSM)?
> (except for the 2.8 part) - The bottom line for me, was that realistically
> the f4 would make it many more places with me than the 2.8, but the 2.8
> sure would be nice when I slap that 2x on...
>
Yes, indeed, being able to use a 2x and still have AF on those
non-professional bodies...
Fred
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
