"Icoz, Evrim" wrote: > I am considering it but I have a really wide amount of uses, but mostly > dance and street photography. It seems to me that for these purposes, something that handles a bit easier might be in order, such as the 70-200/4L, 200/2.8L, or 135/2L. Just MHO, of course. fcc * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
- Re: EOS Who has regretted buying the 70-200/2.8? John Pattenden
- Re: EOS Who has regretted buying the 70-200/2.8? Fred Labrosse
- Re: EOS Who has regretted buying the 70-200/2.8? Daniel ROCHA
- Re: EOS Who has regretted buying the 70-200/2.8? Chris Valentine
- Re: EOS Who has regretted buying the 70-200/2.8? Devin Shieh
- Re: EOS Who has regretted buying the 70-200/2.8? Steve Maller
- Re: EOS Who has regretted buying the 70-200/2.8? YEGEY
- Re: EOS Who has regretted buying the 70-200/2.8? Bill Green
- RE: EOS Who has regretted buying the 70-200/2.8? Icoz, Evrim
- Re: EOS Who has regretted buying the 70-200/2.8? F. Craig Callahan
- Re: EOS Who has regretted buying the 70-200/2.8? John Gunderson
- Re: RE: EOS Who has regretted buying the 70-200/2.8? Bill Green
- Re: EOS Who has regretted buying the 70-200/2.8? Tristan A
- Re: EOS Who has regretted buying the 70-200/2.8? Thomas Bantel
