From: Ron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hi Ron !
> My 50-200/3.5-4.5L has died. I'm now choosing between the 70-200 2.8 or
the
> 4.0. Has anyone regretted buying the 2.8 lens? Too big? Optically not
what
> you expected wide open? Do you leave it home more than you thought you
> would because of the weight? Do faster/more pushable films make you feel
as
> though you don't need the 2.8 now? Or any other reason?
I can't think or imagine a people who have regretted the 70-200 2,8 for
optical quality ! It's the best 70(80)-200 2,8 !
Of course it's heavy but if you want a 2,8 zoom, there is no choice... :)
The aperture of 2,8 is really helpfull at 200mm, in particular, for the
speed. And you can blur the background, in a great way !
Do as you want :)
-- PhOTo -- vOYaGe - GrAPhiSMe --
Portail : http://perso.magic.fr/drocha
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
