Hugo Gävert wrote:
> I know your pain (though I don't have to pay that much for film)... I've
> never understod those who say film is cheap
Relative to the cost of your equipment . . . and to the loss of photos that
can't be reproduced. Or the cost of travel: Not long ago I was at the top of
Independence Pass in Colorado (12,000 ft./4000m), and while I was returning to
my car for another roll of film and a different lens, I overheard a young couple
discussing the scene:
Him: "Should I take another one?"
Her: "No--I don't want to waste film."
Now, if they lived down the hill in Aspen this might make some sense, but if
they were like me and had traveled 2000 miles to get there . . . well, you get
the idea. To travel all that way and then try to save a few frames seems . . .
counterproductive.
fcc
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
