> "Hugo Gävert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Come on, Julian. I think you are now giving people a bit too much
> concern for a thing that is not really that significant.
> Either you are saying that they should get EOS 7 (or EOS 50, or...?)
> to use with that lens, but even then the focusing would perhaps not
> be as fast or as accurate as with EOS 3 (or EOS 1V). Actually it's
> very likely that you don't gain anything. ...
Hi Hugo,
No, my point was that if Richard was already considering fast glass
like EF 85 f/1.8 and EF 100 f/2 or f/2.8, then a USM or HSM f/2.8 zoom
would provide AF performance in the same league. But, as you write,
maybe not in real life.
Would there be any interest if Canon could devise an EOS 3 custom
function to retain cross-type AF down to f/5.6 or f/8?
I didn't mention any other camera bodies, but since you brought it
up, perhaps a backup camera body other than an EOS 3 might be useful.
Are there any users of both the EOS 3, Elan 7E/30, or EOS 50?
How do the AF systems compare?
Speed of eye-control?
Mirror blackout?
AF tracking ability?
Focussing in Low light?
Cheers
Julian Loke
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
